a little over five rounds each in a fluid stressful situation!
What's so 'wow' about that?
London Bridge Incident
- Thread starter XeNoN89
- Start date
a little over five rounds each in a fluid stressful situation!
What's so 'wow' about that?
Because our current UK policy is really working well, isn't it? Her main concern will be how to use it to erode our privacy and liberties.
Why do you have to so much faith in May?
One side is already in the stone age.
Do you have one that includes the question being asked? Since that is sort of the fundamental part of the complaint that the BBC Trust dealt with. The video has been presented as reflecting a position that should be adopted during an active incident, when that wasn't the question that was asked.
People seem to have this idea that the opposite of a shoot-to-kill policy is letting terrorists in the middle of an attack get away because you tried to shoot them in the leg and missed. That's not what it's about.
Soldato
Only those with something to hide would oppose the kind of changes she is proposing.
Soldato
Yes nice video taken out of context, no surprise with it being the Sun, Murdoch's Labour attack dog. Real truth linked here. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...report-on-jeremy-corbyn-was-inaccurate-labour
Again proof? I just wish you would stop posting lie after lie after lie after lie. Still waiting on your proof the police are cowards and ran away.
Associate
Nonsense
You have an intimate knowledge of the 'loadout' for Met Police SFO's and know what the 'established' SFO units and kit are???
Your either plod (in or working with a firearms unit) or are confusing police equipment and clothing for a loadout screen in a COD/ Battlefield game
Caporegime
Which side is that??
Soldato
Why does WhatsApp need to be encrypted? Why do people need to be going on to the dark web? Why do people need to be communicating using secret channels? Why are they allowed to do this?
Why do you think they can stop any of those things?
Soldato
Using the law. This forces companies that provide these services to comply and allow these people to be monitored.
No web encryption means no e-commerce, no online banking etc etc, and if the government can get into something you can bet the hackers can to.... by bye any privacy online
Thing is anyone who really want to get round this sort of stuff can... it will be used to crack down on lots of things but religious extremism in reality
Companies already have to comply...
Ahh yes. Those huge companies will comply because they're companies how do you stop the home grown stuff? No company controls the "dark web". Secret channels aren't controlled by companies (at least not all of them).
IIRC cannabis is illegal "using the law" still numerous ways to get hold of it.
Soldato
With the current laws they must. This is why it will change.
I have a reasonable level of knowledge - not intimate no - but when was the last time you saw an SFO unit equipped with a combination of L119 w/ magpul furniture, ops-core helmet and accessories and tactical QA config, etc.? that is kind of a specific loadout.
I'm merely interested nothing more or less.
What will change?