• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Unigine Superposition Benchmark.

Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,422
Location
2nd City - Manchester.
Up 7 places in the list and 700 point improvement with 16GB HBCC memory segment enabled and overclocked this time :D

Ryzen 1800X @ 4.0
RX Vega 64 XTX AIO, Custom Mode +50% power - 1980Hz Core/1100MHz RAM -
Driver 17.8.1-beta6-7aug

Superposition_Benchmark_v1_0_5224_1502997858.png
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,408
Location
United Kingdom
In my setup the High Bandwidth Cache ask for 12 GB out of the 32 ram lol
Does this thing even work outside benchmarks ? :D
I don't think it uses all that, just a few G B most likely to store data that is not currently needed. For me it definitely boosts some benchmark scores.

So far i see no performance penalty to enabling it, and faster system memory seems to help too.
 
Man of Honour
OP
Joined
21 May 2012
Posts
31,940
Location
Dalek flagship
I don't think it uses all that, just a few G B most likely to store data that is not currently needed. For me it definitely boosts some benchmark scores.

So far i see no performance penalty to enabling it, and faster system memory seems to help too.

You have got some interesting results at high resolution.:)
 
Associate
Joined
30 Jan 2012
Posts
2,483
Location
Stoke On Trent
Sapphire RX 480 (4GB) Nitro+ @1440/1750 (Driver 17.8.1)
Intel i7 6700K @ 4.8GHz

Score 2606

sb4DJkY.png

Looks like im just about hitting my VRAM limit here, is that affecting my score then?

NJqtY9F.png

Bloody 4GB.. glad this isnt a game i like to play :p :p

Temps not too bad for being on air.. who said Sapphire 480's cooling was crap? :D
 
Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,422
Location
2nd City - Manchester.
I wasn't allowed to submit a 3440x1440 run because the bench misreads the res (like on yours) as 3440x1400 - I also got a red splashscreen when I tried it on that res too.

But as it was also not overclocked then the score was rubbish :D

Ryzen 1800x @4.050Ghz
RX Vega 64 @1812/1100Mhz
High Bandwidth Cache enabled
17.8.2

1080P
1440P
3440x1440P
5hMfQEl.jpg

2160P
 
Man of Honour
OP
Joined
21 May 2012
Posts
31,940
Location
Dalek flagship
I wasn't allowed to submit a 3440x1440 run because the bench misreads the res (like on yours) as 3440x1400 - I also got a red splashscreen when I tried it on that res too.

But as it was also not overclocked then the score was rubbish :D

I will remove AMDMatts score as I missed that.

There are a lot of bugs when running that resolution.
 
Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,422
Location
2nd City - Manchester.
Yes no complaints. I think the score is valid, but the resolution int he screenshot does look to be missing 40 pixels.

Sorry about that ;)

I had black lines at the top bottom of the screen that it didnt fill so I presume that it was running in x1400 res.

Did you get the entire screen going red on pressing "run" for 2-3s - I think I had about 16GB of HBCC enabled but it did it without it too ??
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,408
Location
United Kingdom
Sorry about that ;)

I had black lines at the top bottom of the screen that it didnt fill so I presume that it was running in x1400 res.

Did you get the entire screen going red on pressing "run" for 2-3s - I think I had about 16GB of HBCC enabled but it did it without it too ??
Yes i did have the red loading screen, but once the bench started it ran fine.
 
Back
Top Bottom