Life on Mars is class - Ashes to Ashes discussion/spoilers too

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
19,354
Location
South Manchester
I missed the last half series of Life on Mars. Only started watching it originally because my work was used as the outside of the police station!

Ashes to Ashes pricked my interest up last week, so dusted off the old unwatched recordings of LoM and watched the final 4 back to back then Ashes to Ashes last night.

Ashes seems less serious than LoM, and it doesn't help that it's gone all Laaandon. They seem to have ratcheted up the funny (see above), and Keeley Hawes in a non-existent skirt is always a good thing! I'll give it a couple of eps to settle down.

There's a few cracks in the plot regarding the setup between the the two. It's a much better job than the Sarah Connor chronicles lash up however.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
19,354
Location
South Manchester
/Geek car spotting mode on

Oh and I just twigged they screwed up the car again!

The 1981 Quattro's had quad headlights, were all left hand drive and only a couple of hundred got into the UK if memory serves. The TV car is an 1983/1984 car with the facelift front grill and combined lights.

/Geek car spotting mode off
 
Man of Honour
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
29,535
Location
Surrey
Absolutely loved LoM and Sam Tyler/John Simm was fantastic. AtA is good too but not (yet) in the same way. But, being 38, the 80's was my era and a great time to live. So I'm looking forward to the next episode.
 
Associate
Joined
9 Feb 2004
Posts
1,697
Location
The Planet Houston
/Geek car spotting mode on

Oh and I just twigged they screwed up the car again!

The 1981 Quattro's had quad headlights, were all left hand drive and only a couple of hundred got into the UK if memory serves. The TV car is an 1983/1984 car with the facelift front grill and combined lights.

/Geek car spotting mode off

A few weeks ago I read a magazine interview with Philip Glenister where he said the geeks would spot that one! :D
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Oct 2002
Posts
3,540
Location
At the fulcrum of humdrum
Code:
5 REM *** With apologies to programmers everywhere, unless you actually start pointing out the many logic and syntax flaws, in which case GTFO ***
10 IF (decade>1969 AND decade<1980) THEN GOTO 50 ELSE IF (decade>1979 AND decade<1990) GOTO 70;
20 PRINT "SIMISKER IS COOL AND DIXONS SMELLS OF WEE";
30 GOTO 10;
40 END;
50 LET gender$="Male", setting$="North", car$="Ford Cortina", unexplainedspookynemesis$="Test Card Girl", genehunt$="true", referenceblatancy=64, cheese=96, budget=64, budgetappearance=96, swearing$="false";
60 RUN "nostalgiccopshowformula.exe";
70 LET gender$="Female", setting$="Saaaarf", car$="Audi Quattro", unexplainedspookynemesis$="Bowie Clown", genehunt$="true", referenceblatancy=127, cheese=127, budget=96, budgetappearance=32, swearing$="false";
80 RUN "nostalgiccopshowformula.exe";
90 episode=episode+1;
100 GOTO 10

And that, it would appear, is how they did it.

I mean, really: that 'docklands shootout'.... I was half expecting to hear the actors going "Pyow! Pyow", "Drrrrrrr-uh! Drrrrrr-uh!" and so on. You'd have thought the budget would have been a little higher, given it's the sequel to a highly successful series.

I really like LoM, and I 'grew up' in the eighties - maybe it was the fact that there's less distance between the period and now, but was very poor; must pick up next episode.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
29 Mar 2003
Posts
56,824
Location
Stoke on Trent
I mean, really: that 'docklands shootout'.... I was half expecting to hear the actors going "Pyow! Pyow", "Drrrrrrr-uh! Drrrrrr-uh!" and so on.

If I remember correctly they did exactly the same in LOM.
There were several shootouts where nobody got hurt.
Perhaps I'm a bit thick or easily pleased but apart from the main character its exactly the same except for the crap music.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Oct 2002
Posts
3,540
Location
At the fulcrum of humdrum
I think you've both misinterpreted my comment. The implication wasn't that everyone somehow comes out the other end of a gunfight unscathed, it was that there was much less suspension of disbelief.

Because the 80s is closer chronologically, there are fewer chances to hang your disbelief on the hooks of period bell-bottoms and hairy wigs, so instead of a gripping shootout that at least made a game stab at transporting you 'back in time', we were shown something that was more obviously grown adults playing at 'cops and robbers' down the local rec. An homage to Eighties cop shows like Miami Vice it was not.

Anyway, don't get hung up on that; the point I was trying to make was one in agreement with dmpoole and Rotty: it's exactly the same formula as LOM, only with less suspension-of-disbelief hooks. Some novelty would have been nice.

I wonder if they're going to play heavily on the "will they/won't they" relationship between Alex and Gene. Oh that's right, of course they are.
 
Associate
Joined
29 May 2003
Posts
2,038
Location
Cambridge
I wondered if I was viewing it through rose-tinted glasses on Thursday, so I watched it again on the iPlayer this morning.

I've got to say I enjoyed it just as much - it's lighter in tone to LoM but no less enjoyable for that. The 80s setting makes it all the more so - I was coming up to my 12th birthday in 1981 and it was the decade when I first took an interest in music and the wider world around me.

There are going to be so many “OMG, I remember that ...” moments in this series, the only trouble being that it will serve to remind me what an old fart I am now :D ...
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
3,798
Location
Somewhere in the U.K.
Shootouts where nobody gets hurt are common in loads of programs, don't think it's particularly fair to level that criticism purely at Ashes to Ashes.

I thought it was perhaps a homage to The A Team where they would bundle out of a vehicle guns blazing and kill no no-one.

(Before any one points it out I know the A Team did not start until 1983)
 
Back
Top Bottom