Not really. It simply means 'what happens happens'. It doesn't mean anything unless you start trying to make nothing out of something.Is the first sentence could be construed as the definition of fate?
Not really. It simply means 'what happens happens'. It doesn't mean anything unless you start trying to make nothing out of something.Is the first sentence could be construed as the definition of fate?
You beleived something you saw on /b/?
Not really. It simply means 'what happens happens'. It doesn't mean anything unless you start trying to make nothing out of something.
That Erin Omoss story is true though and I've seen the pictures from the crash on /b/...very gruesome if it's the same crash which I think it is, head completely ripped apart...
Not at all. It says what ever the result of the situation, is the result of the situation. It doesn't say that there is only one result.The only possible definition of "what will be will be" is "that's just the way things go, no matter what". Which is the same as saying no-one has any real control over any situation.
Im still not convinced, that place is just annoying nowadays.
Not at all. It says what ever the result of the situation, is the result of the situation. It doesn't say that there is only one result.
Which is the same thing.
Lysander said:.... no-one has any real control over any situation.
Nitefly said:It doesn't say that there is only one result. (Rephrased - There is no one situation which will happen in the future)
Why not? It's perfectly plausible. What makes any of us think we have control over our decisions? The only reason we think we have free will is that the concept of not having free will is terrifying to most of us.