Drivers attitudes to cyclists

Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,421
Location
Utopia
No manoz not immobile, they just didn't often travel longer distances on a whim and when they did, it took bloody ages. It may surprise you to learn this, indeed I was shocked when I found out, but we are no longer in the 19th century. Any amount of rolleyes smileys won't change that. :D
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jan 2006
Posts
24,954
Location
Chadderton, Oldham
15 mins of me driving to the nearest town in comfort vs a minimum of 45 mins for me cycling. Hmm... which should I choose... :D

I cycle 10 miles to college, and I get there before the bus usually if I set off the same time or get there same time, and also whilst you're sitting there piling on the pounds think of those cyclists getting all healthy but I dont suppose you would care if you was a fat blob....

And how long is it for this 15 min drive? I'm happy to do 16-20 miles every hour tbh.

It does not take forever to get places, to get from York to Manchester on a bicycle it would be around 4-6 hours Vs 1.5 in a car, but at least its not spitting loads of **** into the air and also costing lots of money.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,421
Location
Utopia
And how long is it for this 15 min drive? I'm happy to do 16-20 miles every hour tbh.

It's almost exactly 10 miles to the nearest town... and then when I get there if I want to go to the other side of town i'd have to cycle another 20 minutes, then afterwards cycle another 45 minutes back. Oh, and what if the weather changes and it starts persisting it down while i'm halfway there or back? Again, no thanks. :p

It does not take forever to get places, to get from York to Manchester on a bicycle it would be around 4-6 hours Vs 1.5 in a car, but at least its not spitting loads of **** into the air and also costing lots of money.

Why the heck would you ant to travel 6 hours on a bicycle to travel to a town? That would be a coimplete waste of time, and only a good idea if it was purely for exercise. For anything else, it's completely impractical.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Jul 2006
Posts
5,527
Location
Leeds Booo..
No manoz not immobile, they just didn't often travel longer distances on a whim and when they did, it took bloody ages. It may surprise you to learn this, indeed I was shocked when I found out, but we are no longer in the 19th century. Any amount of rolleyes smileys won't change that. :D

You seem to think the 21st century is a good thing
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jan 2006
Posts
24,954
Location
Chadderton, Oldham
It's almost exactly 10 miles to the nearest town... and then when I get there if I want to go to the other side of town i'd have to cycle another 20 minutes, then afterwards cycle another 45 minutes back. Oh, and what if the weather changes and it starts persisting it down while i'm halfway there or back? Again, no thanks. :p



Why the heck would you ant to travel 6 hours on a bicycle to travel to a town? That would be a coimplete waste of time, and only a good idea if it was purely for exercise. For anything else, it's completely impractical.

I cycle because I enjoy it. 10 miles and it takes you 15 mins? Must be busy on a bicycle it takes me 34 mins just over half as long and thats on a bicycle, free and if its going to rain then I'll get the bus. Infact it takes me 34 mins to cycle 10.9 miles.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,421
Location
Utopia
I cycle because I enjoy it. 10 miles and it takes you 15 mins? Must be busy on a bicycle it takes me 34 mins just over half as long and thats on a bicycle, free and if its going to rain then I'll get the bus. Infact it takes me 34 mins to cycle 10.9 miles.

Err 15 mins is making good time in my car to get to the nearest town, my route is nearly all small country roads and some horrible hills. How can you compare when you don't even know what the roads i'm travelling on are like. ;)
 
Associate
Joined
29 Jan 2006
Posts
639
Location
Exmouth, Devon

Sickening.

The other day I was cut up by a driver who did it out of pure spite. I got her plate and reported her to the police. Infact I report every cretin who attempts to screw me over and risks injurying or killing me. The last time I had an actual impact with a car, I couldnt walk for three months.

If any driver were to hit me now, it frightens me that I am not sure I could control my temper. They better hope they break my limbs and knock me out!
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jan 2006
Posts
24,954
Location
Chadderton, Oldham
Err 15 mins is making good time in my car to get to the nearest town, my route is nearly all small country roads and some horrible hills. How can you compare when you don't even know what the roads i'm travelling on are like. ;)

Oh are you mystic meg now? You dont know what the roads I'm traveling on are like...

I can do hills and country roads, the 23 miles circuit I do is bumpy as hell full of horse **** and a couple of hills I do that in 1 hour 30.

Nowt wrong with cycling its fun and you sound lazy!
 
Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
651
Location
Kent
I've just read the first few pages of this thread and skimmed over the last 2/3rds of it so please bear this in mind.

I've been a regular cyclist for the last year or so and want to add my views.

1. Car owners pay VED - vehicle excise duty to use their cars on the road, as do I with both my cars, not a road tax. This is, if I'm correct, is related to the pollution level of your vehicle. And as my bike is non-pollutant we don't need to pay VED. Those of you who frequent the motors section of this forum should know better....

2. Road position - it is encouraged that cyclists take up the primary road postion to make it easier for car drivers to see them, ie make it easier for car drivers....thus make it safer for cyclists. While we are on road position, I would like to mention that correctly pumped up road tyres are normally 23mm in width and over 100 psi, mine are at 120 psi. If you can imagine riding over a manhole cover or over the usual road roughness associated with the gutter you can then understand why we sometimes ride so far out in the road and occasionally veer out without indicating. It's most uncomfortable and can be an expensive situation to put yourself in when some set's of wheels can cost over £1000 - more than a Pug 106 with baked bean can exhaust car in some cases.

3. Cycle lanes - theses are normally in the gutter area of the road that is littered with broken glass from the WKD bottles of underage drinkers and Mcdonald wrappers that have normally been thrown out of the window at innocent cyclists. Me being one of those cyclists....and it's been said before: they are not a legal requirement to use...

What disgusts me most is some of the attitudes of people on here with regards to running over cyclists. What gives you the right to act or think like that ?
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
YOU FAT ******!!!

Thats what I'd say

Venster you have to go in cycle lanes though as if you dont you just get abuse form lots of drivers :\.

Nah, im not that bad. I only shout at stupid cyclist, or people on mountain bikes...

Road Bike = Fine, just dont sit in the middle of the road or 3 abreast.
Mountain Bike = The clue is in the name... go find some hills or tracks or woods, there more fun!

I used to ride quite a lot and im looking to get back into it. Mountain biking this is, so the only trips ill be doing on the road is from my house to Sailsbury plane, roughtly 1/2 mile...
 
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2005
Posts
28,851
Location
Canada
I work in a practice that specialise in RTA accidents, we defend 99% of our cases and believe me. Car v Cycle. Not pretty, i've seen pictures ! And it's not the head that gets injured in a cycle/car accident, it's usually from the waist down i find. It's really horrific.

That's what gets me, there is all this moaning about "cyclists should always wear a helmet when riding on the road". Well I honestly believe that the road is one of the least needed place for a helmet.

You fall off on a road it's usually because you have been hit by a car and as you said most injuries aren't going to be helped with a helmet. On the other hand fall off on a cycle track or out in the woods and most of the injuries (getting rid of scratches) will probably be bumps to the head. Yes wear a helmet to be safe on the road but don't go out in your skin tight lycra at the same time, and don't even contemplate telling others off for not wearing a helmet on the road...

Top tip for cyclists ( which will probably enrage some car drivers on here), as already mentioned, protect your space. Cycle between half to 1m away from the pavement, that way if a stupid car driver gets too close you can make some space between you and them by going closer to the pavement, you can't if you're in the gutter.

I believe that there should be a compulsary, say 20 hours of road cycling/horse riding included within driving tests. It may be an annoyance to some but it would vastly increase the awareness of a lot of car drivers to other road users (motoryclists, cyclists, horses and others) that have just as much right to be on the road as you.

I cycle, but try and obey the rules of the road as much as I can, with the exception of the occasional red light as due to the brilliant way Plymouth has set up their motion sensors on the traffic lights if I don't go through them I would end up waiting forever (quite a lot of them don't seem to be able to sense cyclists coming up to them:rolleyes:)
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jan 2006
Posts
24,954
Location
Chadderton, Oldham
Nah, im not that bad. I only shout at stupid cyclist, or people on mountain bikes...

Road Bike = Fine, just dont sit in the middle of the road or 3 abreast.
Mountain Bike = The clue is in the name... go find some hills or tracks or woods, there more fun!

I used to ride quite a lot and im looking to get back into it. Mountain biking this is, so the only trips ill be doing on the road is from my house to Sailsbury plane, roughtly 1/2 mile...

I use to ride my MTB on the road, to college and back about 25 mile a day, nothing wrong with them on the road.
 
Back
Top Bottom