I can't really see it, this laptop isn't calibrated (poor excuse as the calibrator is in the car)
fair enough, there is quite a big difference on my monitor.
which is better .....
- Thread starter knowlesy
- Start date
fair enough, there is quite a big difference on my monitor.
I was bored so had another go, but tbh I've overdone it a bit, I need to learn when to stop
wowy!!!!
Caporegime
you have email!
Soldato
http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/
I post nearly every day and only around 55 HDR's this year. Clearly you're not watching me close enough. Seriously dude, if you're going to jump into a thread with randomly stupid nonsense about how I've single handedly blown HDR out of all proportion and I milk it then you better know wtf you're on about. You don't know the technical side, you don't even know what I do and you sure as hell don't know HDR.
yeshk its rockpeteuk [at] gmail [.] com
Caporegime
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 9,302
Well firstly this isn't exactly a perfect condition for the requirement of HDR. These shots come out perfectly ok using a good set up with maybe a grad filter if needed. Really isn't. higher aperture will numb the powerful light sources from the buildings.
Should really get these shots done well enough without HDR before going into HDR otherwise you'll fall victim to it and be highly dependant on it.
Heres a processed version of your shot.
Johnny
Should really get these shots done well enough without HDR before going into HDR otherwise you'll fall victim to it and be highly dependant on it.
Heres a processed version of your shot.
Johnny
Soldato
Looking through this thread and none of the images are what I'd class as HDR, just post-processed. Most of them just look like the contrast and saturation has been turned up far too much.
Soldato
Whats the point in HDR if you aren't adding anything to the shot by using it?
you need to read the thread again, there not supposed to all be HDR.
None.
Well firstly this isn't exactly a perfect condition for the requirement of HDR. These shots come out perfectly ok using a good set up with maybe a grad filter if needed. Really isn't. higher aperture will numb the powerful light sources from the buildings.
Should really get these shots done well enough without HDR before going into HDR otherwise you'll fall victim to it and be highly dependant on it.
Heres a processed version of your shot.
Johnny
If the water was slightly darker, best version. Noise Reduction/darker water = win.
Rest have turned too cartoony, especially yantorsen's.
Guess as it's Christmas he's allowed to edit it like that, looks like a street full of Christmas lights
.
Soldato
Yes I realise this. As I said, they're just heavily post processed, none of the images are showing HDR, just increased contrast and saturation.
I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that (all the pictures I've posted up here are like this, I'm just saying it isn't HDR)
none of them were supposed to be HDR what are you on about? There not even that heavily processed really.
If the water was slightly darker, best version. Noise Reduction/darker water = win.
Rest have turned too cartoony, especially yantorsen's.
Guess as it's Christmas he's allowed to edit it like that, looks like a street full of Christmas lights
this better for you?
.