• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

;)

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,188
ANyone watched the vids comparing the noise of the cards, ouch, the 470/480gtx are loud, very loud at max power. I find a heavily overclocked 5850 is a touch to loud and am planning on doing something with it, even if I had the cash I wouldn't buy a 480gtx, not till they find a way to mount a TRUE on it anyway.

I keep seeing things that don't add up though.

The uk [H] puts the power usage between a 480gtx load system and a 5870 load system at something insane, either the 480gtx is using 250W and the 5870 180W is very much worst case scenario and their card is getting no where near that under load, or the 480gtx uses WAY more than 250W. Same goes, [H] shows a 50W load difference between the 470/480gtx, though specs wise the difference should only be 35W.

Maybe Nvidia are rating just the gpu and not memory/power components or something odd, the numbers aren't matching up though.

[H] seems to say the only thing Nvidia did right was 480gtx in sli, but thats because the 5970 is a downclocked 5870, and realistically if RRP's were followed in the UK at £300 and £430, the 5970 gives you massive massive value for that performance even with lower clocks, while 2x480gtx's is the price of 2x480gtx's. The problem is a single GTX is basically as expensive as a 5970, you could afford a 2nd 5970 before you could add on a third 480gtx. If you just bought 2x 5870's though, or even worse 2x5850's and clocked them to their max, 480gtx sli would be beaten, with cards costing less than a single 480gtx, oppps.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
10 Dec 2009
Posts
157
anda1anda1234.jpg
;)
 
Associate
Joined
10 Mar 2004
Posts
660
[H] seems to say the only thing Nvidia did right was 480gtx in sli, but thats because the 5970 is a downclocked 5870, and realistically if RRP's were followed in the UK at £300 and £430, the 5970 gives you massive massive value for that performance even with lower clocks, while 2x480gtx's is the price of 2x480gtx's. The problem is a single GTX is basically as expensive as a 5970, you could afford a 2nd 5970 before you could add on a third 480gtx. If you just bought 2x 5870's though, or even worse 2x5850's and clocked them to their max, 480gtx sli would be beaten, with cards costing less than a single 480gtx, oppps.

Fully agree, having just read that review at HardOCP. I really don't understand their "logic" sometimes. Here is a quote from the review:

Referring to performance in Battlefield Bad Company 2, they say:

"Therefore, the gameplay experience was identical between GTX 480 SLI (yes, that's SLI!!!!!!) and Radeon HD 5970."

Is this supposed to be impressive??



Yet, in the conclusion, they go on to say:

"We saw real-world benefits, we think are related to the framebuffer, in Aliens vs. Predator. The Radeon HD 5970 was not able to play with 4X AA at 2560x1600, whereas GeForce GTX 480 SLI was. We also experienced awesome performance in Bad Company 2 with 16X CSAA and 2X TR SSAA that was much more than "playable."


GeForce GTX 480 SLI clearly provides a better gameplay experience than the dual-GPU Radeon HD 5970. In the dual-GPU competition."

Come on......they're comparing one dual GPU card with two single GPU cards, the former solution costs £500, while the latter costs around £900.

They should have compared sli'd 480s to crossfired 5970s, since going by current prices, the difference is is only £100 instead of £400 (excluding the suspiciously low Gainward).
 
Associate
Joined
13 Nov 2007
Posts
1,483
biased reviews all over the place ... just gotta love em :D

After losing in Left 4 Dead and Bad Company 2, the GTX 400 series is back in the winner’s circle here, and once again by double-digit percentages. In fact the situation is quite unusual – the higher the resolution, the wider the gap gets.

With 50% more RAM surely the GTX 480 can be good at something ... so no surprise there then! The Anand review is not exactly objective.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3783&p=15
 
Back
Top Bottom