• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

E8400 (3.6GHz) upgrade to Q9300 worth £85?

Soldato
Joined
30 Jan 2009
Posts
17,175
Location
Aquilonem Londinensi
Been offered a Q9300 for £85, not sure of the stepping etc yet. Worth it? Any steppings to avoid and are these decent clockers? I've no intention to upgrade board and RAM yet...

PC is mainly used for gaming. Have got 4GB DDR2 6400 and a HD4890
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Jan 2010
Posts
3,188
Location
Guildford
Not too bad for the price but as said low multi, so make sure your board can hit a decent FSB and check what your RAM multiplier options are (unlinked would be best).
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2010
Posts
14,591
I would spend a bit more and try to get a Q9550 if I were you.

Sidenote: Why is your E8400 only at 3.6GHz? It should be easily overclockable to 4GHz...
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jan 2009
Posts
17,175
Location
Aquilonem Londinensi
I would spend a bit more and try to get a Q9550 if I were you.

Sidenote: Why is your E8400 only at 3.6GHz? It should be easily overclockable to 4GHz...

At 3.6 my cooler (Arctic freezer) can run passively <45c browsing and such :)

The board, Biostar T something, isn't
an overclocking beast but I have had 4.2 stable but that needed more voltage and made it 60c+
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2010
Posts
14,591
At 3.6 my cooler (Arctic freezer) can run passively <45c browsing and such :)

The board, Biostar T something, isn't
an overclocking beast but I have had 4.2 stable but that needed more voltage and made it 60c+
Well, if you have managed 4.2GHz stable before, then that is a decent enough overclocking board already.

Sometimes the extra 200MHz on the top end require much more voltage than the frequency before it...may be you can overclock to 3.8-4.0GHz instead of 4.2GHz at a lower voltage?

What vcore you are on? (Now and when you had 4.2GHz stable)
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jan 2009
Posts
17,175
Location
Aquilonem Londinensi
Never planned to run the 8400 passive, just messing about with temp management and set the fans to start at 55c. As it is the CPU fan only starts when gaming, ripping a DVD or watching HD content.

At >3.8 it seems to require quite a jump in voltage (3.6 is @ stock v) and the temps sit at 60c doing nowt (slow fan speed).

I guess I don't need an upgrade, just got the itch :)
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Nov 2002
Posts
6,852
Location
Romford
In virtually all games the 8400 will be quicker, as you'll have trouble getting the Q9300 past 3.6ghz unless you have a good board and it also has lower cache per core.

Only real upgrade worth considering is a Q9550 or Xeon x3360.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Feb 2007
Posts
3,430
To be honnest. I do not notice much difference between my E3300 @ 4GHz (little brother of the E8400) and my i7 920 @ 3.8GHz. Sure, if I run benches the quad will be ~20% faster in CPU intensive games and >2x as fast at encoding, but most people do not encode much and 60fps is enough in games.

I say stick with the E8400 unless you encode HD video a lot.

The biggest upgrade I have ever made to a pc has been installing an SSD. Much better than a CPU step up in terms of overall system speed and Windows zippiness.
 
Associate
Joined
3 Jul 2007
Posts
1,845
Location
Rochdale/whitworth
Been offered a Q9300 for £85, not sure of the stepping etc yet. Worth it? Any steppings to avoid and are these decent clockers? I've no intention to upgrade board and RAM yet...

PC is mainly used for gaming. Have got 4GB DDR2 6400 and a HD4890

yeh if you sell your E8400 for 65ish ( not sure what a E8400 is worth now) that means you get a good quad far a £20!:eek:
 

Vir

Vir

Associate
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
1,860
Location
Netherlands
Coming from a Xeon E3110 (E8400) I'd say stick with the E8400 for now and save up for a SSD or a bigger upgrade later. It's not worth it now.
 
Associate
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Posts
142
Location
Sheffield, GB
E8400 is much better than a Q9300. A Q9400 would have been debatable and a Q9550 would have got my vote, but if i were you I'd save your money for a bigger upgrade in the future. The wolfdale range are cracking CPU's even my E8200 keeps up with my GTS250 when oc'd a lil. One of the best CPU's i bought! wait till they sell the i7 960 on ebay for bargain prices mate.
 
Associate
Joined
12 Nov 2003
Posts
2,342
Location
Skipton
Been offered a Q9300 for £85, not sure of the stepping etc yet. Worth it? Any steppings to avoid and are these decent clockers? I've no intention to upgrade board and RAM yet...

PC is mainly used for gaming. Have got 4GB DDR2 6400 and a HD4890

Definately not. My Q9450 @ 3.4ghz doesn't feel much faster than my old E5200 @ 4ghz in most games.
 
Back
Top Bottom