backup solution

Associate
Joined
12 Sep 2007
Posts
1,018
Location
Edinburgh
Hello,

Friend of a friend has asked me to help them out with backup solution for their small company.

The network consists of one server with 160gb worth of data and 5 windows XP machines.

I was thinking a tape drive is probably a bit OTT for the size of the network and thus was going to suggest external hdd's as means of backing up.

any suggestions would be grand,

thanks.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Oct 2009
Posts
1,005
Depends how often it changes, one big upload over the weekend then just incrementals.
Also, what are the backups for? DR or just incase people delete things they shouldnt?
For DR it should be off site, otherwise (or aswell as, ideally) you could get a decent nas for fast restore locally..
 
Associate
OP
Joined
12 Sep 2007
Posts
1,018
Location
Edinburgh
my calculations show just under a month to upload 160gb worth of data on a standard 768kb upload speed. i think the local nas box/external hard disk drives might be the way to go.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
9,711
Location
Retired Don
for 160gb worth of data? wouldnt that take months to transfer on your average ~8mbit connection?

You didn't really specify they were on an standard ADSL connection.

Also, what are the purpose of the backups? Offsite disaster recovery, recovering the odd work doc etc??

Also, 160GB, when compressed with a good backup solution would be more like 100GB.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Feb 2003
Posts
7,171
Location
Shropshire
Find a solution / service that can do an initial seed via a USB drive, then you just have to worry about the changes. A reasonably clever solution should also just send the delta changes - as a rough example, if a 200MB file was edited but only 5MB changed, only the 5MB of changes would be sent.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jun 2003
Posts
16,084
Location
Gloucestershire
Does the server support RAID1 and Hot swap drives? Could always configure it as such and just whip a drive in and out and store the other drive somewhere safe, do a rotation to keep it all backed up

Combine that with shadow copies and you can then restore individual files on the fly as well as having a full backup

Probably not the ideal solution mind you but just thought id add it to the list of ideas

EDIT: what the hell just tried to edit this post and instead of "save" i had a button saying "vote now" o_O
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
9,711
Location
Retired Don
Find a solution / service that can do an initial seed via a USB drive, then you just have to worry about the changes. A reasonably clever solution should also just send the delta changes - as a rough example, if a 200MB file was edited but only 5MB changed, only the 5MB of changes would be sent.

Aye, this is exactly what we use and sell to our customers. It's very popular with small businesses for the reasons you have posted!
 
Man of Honour
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Posts
9,515
Location
London Town!
Does the server support RAID1 and Hot swap drives? Could always configure it as such and just whip a drive in and out and store the other drive somewhere safe, do a rotation to keep it all backed up

Combine that with shadow copies and you can then restore individual files on the fly as well as having a full backup

Probably not the ideal solution mind you but just thought id add it to the list of ideas

Please do not ever do this. It's a horrible solution that will (and deserves to) go wrong at some point, if you're really being that cheap backup to a USB hard drive or something. Regularly deliberately breaking your RAID set is a bad idea...
 
Man of Honour
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Posts
9,515
Location
London Town!
Find a solution / service that can do an initial seed via a USB drive, then you just have to worry about the changes. A reasonably clever solution should also just send the delta changes - as a rough example, if a 200MB file was edited but only 5MB changed, only the 5MB of changes would be sent.

That's a good solution but unfortunately those solutions tend to be the more professional level online backup products, you aren't talking mozy/carbonite prices generally, more like somewhere between 50p and £1 a gig per month, which even with compression is going to come to £100 a month, which makes a tape drive economical quicker than you think.
 
Associate
Joined
14 Apr 2010
Posts
513
What about sharing an external Hard drive between the PC's, use something like Rich Copy to back up? Also, if very important data, surely that can be backed up online? If its not too large?
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jun 2003
Posts
16,084
Location
Gloucestershire
Please do not ever do this. It's a horrible solution that will (and deserves to) go wrong at some point

hmmm i was recommended to do this on one server by someone i regard to be one of the smartest people i've ever met, we swap the drive once a month on one particular server (only server i would never recommend doing it on is a DC) we've never had an issue with it in over a year of drive swapping, why would you say it is such a bad idea?
 
Associate
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Posts
977
Location
Near to Overclockers
If you want a simple solution, have a look at EMC Retrospect. It will backup the server and all of the PCs. I used to use 3 external HDs, 2 doing incremental backups (alternatlively) and one for a monthly backup. The 2 incremental backups were stored in a fire safe each night and the monthly (or you could do a weekly) backup was taken off site.

You can even download a free 30 trial from their website.

Mushii
 
Man of Honour
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Posts
9,515
Location
London Town!
hmmm i was recommended to do this on one server by someone i regard to be one of the smartest people i've ever met, we swap the drive once a month on one particular server (only server i would never recommend doing it on is a DC) we've never had an issue with it in over a year of drive swapping, why would you say it is such a bad idea?

It's something which mad sysadmins suggest. It's simply not designed to do it and you're asking for trouble, while it rebuilds you're vulnerable to disk failure (think it's not going to happen? I've seen two RAID10 sets dead due to multiple drive failures in quick succession so it does) and it just begs for a mistake in which disk is pulled or similar.

But the best reason not to do it is because it just isn't designed for it. There are many very good backup solutions designed for the job and this simply isn't one of them. It's like so many things in IT which are possible but seriously inadvisable.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jun 2003
Posts
16,084
Location
Gloucestershire
It's something which mad sysadmins suggest. It's simply not designed to do it and you're asking for trouble, while it rebuilds you're vulnerable to disk failure (think it's not going to happen? I've seen two RAID10 sets dead due to multiple drive failures in quick succession so it does) and it just begs for a mistake in which disk is pulled or similar.

But the best reason not to do it is because it just isn't designed for it. There are many very good backup solutions designed for the job and this simply isn't one of them. It's like so many things in IT which are possible but seriously inadvisable.

understandable reasoning :) in the future I shall now avoid this approach, cheers
 
Man of Honour
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Posts
9,515
Location
London Town!
understandable reasoning :) in the future I shall now avoid this approach, cheers

I understand it initially seeming fine though. I've discovered a nice little mess recently, a server which we rely on for various things which was originally running on some massive 5U box, now somebody needed to move it to a smaller, newer machine. So they cloned the disks onto a nice shiny new server. Seems entirely logical?

Now I have a 3 month old server running Redhat 6 (not RHEL6 - redhat 6 - from 1995) which is running a kernel so old it doesn't know about USB....
 
Back
Top Bottom