Wether it's genuinely random or not, its still a fixed situtation that creates more random combinations than what would have been picked manually otherwise, it's fills up the possibilities of no one winning.
I think you're confusing my usage of the word fixed, I don't mean fixed as in fiddled for the organiser to win/profit everytime the lotto profits enough not to do that. I mean it in the sense of they've fixed it so they've decreased the chances of it rolling over.
They've fixed it in the fairest possible sense by doing lucky dip and making it genuinely random, and I'm no mathematician but surely if the outcome is random, picking random numbers (or a lucky dip) is a good (and if you ask me, a better) option.
I don't know maybe someone else could explain it better than me.