How many of you use your SSD for games?

Soldato
Joined
11 Apr 2004
Posts
4,413
And how do you have your SSD setup, like say SSD as boot drive and a few games installed or do you have a dedicated drive for games?

How do you go about installing steam games on a OS drive with such limited space or do you install steam into your os drive and only keep a few games loaded at a time?
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Apr 2011
Posts
3,810
Location
Nottingham
I have an SSD as a OS (W7 x64) drive. With games on it, Only a couple of games though (Dirt 3, MW2, BFBC2) with all windows updates and a few lightweight programs installed I have about 30GB free. I have installed 90% of applications/games on a WD 2TB drive but have the most played games on the SSD.
My direct download folder for everything is on the SATA drive, not the SSD. Dont have steam sorry
Will this affect the life of the SSD do you think?
 
Associate
Joined
2 Aug 2010
Posts
141
Location
Sussex
Personally, I have found games to not be much better on a SSD over a decent HDD.

Its because unlike an OS, games tend to do in-frequent large reads off of the disk rather than frequent small reads (a map is only loaded once per game) and therefore the difference in speed for the SSD isn't as noticeable.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jun 2007
Posts
8,737
Location
Ireland
mainly boot drive and few programs , keep games on 1tb cavair black dont really need loads games fast enough and less hassle when reformatting. would keep few games on ssd but to much hassle splitting steam folder up some how
 

NqR

NqR

Associate
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
537
Location
Sheffield
Personally, I have found games to not be much better on a SSD over a decent HDD.

Its because unlike an OS, games tend to do in-frequent large reads off of the disk rather than frequent small reads (a map is only loaded once per game) and therefore the difference in speed for the SSD isn't as noticeable.

That's what i noticed too. Basically it's not worth it.
Better buy a small ssd just for the OS and put games on a HDD
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Mar 2011
Posts
7,485
Location
Bada Bing
i keep my game on the ssd, i only play one game at a time, when i get bored i uninstall it and install a new one :)

EDIT: btw, i will play the same game for a few months until i get bored :p
 
Associate
Joined
2 Aug 2010
Posts
141
Location
Sussex
I unfortunately can't remember where I read it, but I seem to remember something about most SSD being about equal in speed for large reads such as games (might be mistaken).
 
Associate
Joined
11 Jan 2003
Posts
844
Location
Loughborough
The only game I've got on my ssd is starcraft 2, which isn't really much better than a hard drive, but I can't be bothered to move it :p.

I've experimented with symbolic links for various steam games and haven't found any which are significantly faster running on the ssd. I think having a hard drive dedicated to running the game, with the ssd managing the os, is pretty damn fast in itself.
 
Associate
Joined
12 May 2011
Posts
435
Location
Kilwinning, Scotland
60gb ssd for win7 and black ops. Map load times faster than friend with identical setup except 1tb hdd, but not so much he misses start of round. Another friend with older hardware is always late in. I just slaved old 1tb and run the steam exe from there for old games, have new copy of steam on ssd for black ops.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Dec 2008
Posts
1,812
60gb ssd for win7 and black ops. Map load times faster than friend with identical setup except 1tb hdd, but not so much he misses start of round. Another friend with older hardware is always late in. I just slaved old 1tb and run the steam exe from there for old games, have new copy of steam on ssd for black ops.

Now there's an idea, how's it let you install though? Surely regkeys clash?
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2009
Posts
2,727
Location
Gillingham, Kent
I've got some of my games on a second SSD (128GB C300 for OS, 128GB V100+ for games) but the only game there is a noticable difference in loading times so far is GTAIV, and even then it's only slight.

I ended up with a second SSD due to an RMA on a broken X25-M taking over 2 months (not fron OcUK!), by which time I'd bought a replacement SSD anyway, but I definitely would say it's not worth buying one just to run your games off it unless there's a particular game that is known to benefit from it that you play a lot. In general, get a fast HDD and stick your games on that.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2009
Posts
2,727
Location
Gillingham, Kent
Now there's an idea, how's it let you install though? Surely regkeys clash?

I found it easiest to use Steam Mover to set Junction Points in my Steamapps directory, so I am able to move individual games onto the SSD while leaving the majority of them on the HDD. So far as Steam is concerned the game folder is in the right place (e.g. D:/Games/Steam/Steamapps) but the folder itself is actually located on the SSD (E:/Games/ ).

http://www.traynier.com/software/steammover
 
Associate
Joined
27 Apr 2010
Posts
69
ArmA 2 benefits from ssd

Before I got an SSD, I had quite a lot of stuttering and slow texture loading (resulting in missing textures like totally white faces or buildings and such, then stuttering and finally textures getting rendered in front of my eyesI. I got an Intel X-25M G2 160GB SSD for windows 7, ArmA 2. Now there's a lot less stuttering, texture pop up has almost disappeared, only in some rare cases does it happen and launching any program installed on SSD is way faster than it was on my Samsung F3. SSD drive is most likely the best upgrade you can get for your computer.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
12 May 2011
Posts
435
Location
Kilwinning, Scotland
Now there's an idea, how's it let you install though? Surely regkeys clash?

Doesn't seem to be a problem, I've since installed Operation Red River and it runs fine no problems. Only thing you need to do is take files from the Steam folder that are shared, e.g. half-life files, and copy them to your SSD, same with save game files which need to be copied over to your user profile.
 
Back
Top Bottom