STS-135 - The Final Space Shuttle Mission

Soldato
Joined
7 Jul 2009
Posts
16,234
Location
Newcastle/Aberdeen
Very sad that this is the end of the shuttles. :(

Also James Webb telescope will probably be cancelled now.

Sad day for astronuts.

It's not 'will probably', it's 'could possibly'. Even so it's a shame that it's even a consideration this far into the project, especially after the recent manufacturing milestone. The ESA is highly involved anyway, would cancelling it not be a breach of contract?

The thing about Webb is that it actually looks like a satellite, not just an (albeit incredibly impressive) toilet paper tube wrapped in kitchen foil. And as we all know - looks are everything ;)
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jul 2009
Posts
16,234
Location
Newcastle/Aberdeen
tumblrlnzf4ytawm1qcnwce.png
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Nov 2007
Posts
6,419
Location
.
have they ever experimented with sex in space ?

im in work for the launch :( if it goes ahead today
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Apr 2006
Posts
3,699
Location
Nottingham
Although fueling is underway the forecast remains at only 30% favourable conditions for launch today.

*fingers crossed!!!* Although it has been cancelled under more favourable conditions :(


I was reading a "tweet" from "Prof. Brian Cox" yesterday (inverted commas as I don't think it is actually him that tweets) which said that

1) the cost of NASA is 0.13% of the USA's GDP and brings in a 9x return...
2) the amount money required to fund NASA was the same as the british bank bailout...
3) the war in Iraq cost the same as a manned mission to mars...

Why is the government so reluctant to fund science projects such as NASA if they bring in a 9x return?

I'm assuming one answer is... there is no oil on mars :p /joke
 
Soldato
Joined
4 Feb 2003
Posts
6,118
Location
Birmingham

That's all very well except that currently there are more space missions currently running than would ever have been imaginable. We have active probes orbiting, stationed on, or travelling to: the Sun, Mercury, Venus, The Moon, Mars, the dwarf planet Ceres & the asteroid 4 Vesta, Saturn, Pluto and the Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko add to that the various space telescopes and observatories. We also have Voyager 1 & Voyager 2 still active and heading out of the Solar System with Voyager 2 now reaching the boundry of the Heliosphere.

We certainly aren't slacking on the exploration front, we don't need to risk peoples life in space to push the boundries of human achievement. We now live in some ways in a far more exciting space age than 50s/60s peak of manned space flight.

Iconic as it may have been, the Shuttle program is a very expensive white elephant in the 21st century and no longer fit for purpose having never really achieved the lofty aims laid down upon it's inception.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Nov 2004
Posts
16,024
Location
9th Inner Circle
End of an era. So sad. Mankind's future is in space, to turn inwards is a big mistake.

As Commander Jeff Sinclair said in Babylon 5:
No. We have to stay here. And there's a simple reason why. Ask ten different scientists about the environment, population control, genetics, and you'll get ten different answers, but there's one thing every scientist on the planet agrees on. Whether it happens in a hundred years or a thousand years or a million years, eventually our Sun will grow cold and go out. When that happens, it won't just take us. It'll take Marilyn Monroe, and Lao-Tzu, and Einstein, and Morobuto, and Buddy Holly, and Aristophanes, and - all of this - all of this - was for nothing. Unless we go to the stars.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Aug 2009
Posts
429
End of an era. So sad. Mankind's future is in space, to turn inwards is a big mistake.

As Commander Jeff Sinclair said in Babylon 5:

Thats why its the shuttles last mission, to go further into space the vehicles used will have no wings.
Gutted to though as the shuttles are awesome!

Jay
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Nov 2004
Posts
16,024
Location
9th Inner Circle
Thats why its the shuttles last mission, to go further into space the vehicles used will have no wings.
Gutted to though as the shuttles are awesome!

Jay

The shuttles are, indeed, awesome. The problem is we have nothing to replace them. No workhorse for low earth orbit. If we cannot manage that how the Hell can we manage getting beyond our local Earth-Moon system?

Short sighted idiotic politicians too interested in kickbacks from military contracts and oil companies are the problem.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
11 Mar 2004
Posts
76,634
The shuttles are, indeed, awesome. The problem is we have nothing to replace them. No workhorse for low earth orbit. If we cannot manage that how the Hell can we manage getting beyond our local Earth-Moon system?

Short sighted idiotic politicians too interested in kickbacks from military contracts and oil companies are the problem.
That's the problem, it's a sad day to see them go, but they need replacing and I have no problem with commercialising the launches. It'll bring in revenue to further research and allow NASA to concentrate on science and the bigger picture like going to mars.
It's just a shame it's ending before a replacement, shame NASA cancelled the replacement many many years ago and shame we can build an ISS but seemingly can't collaborate for a space vehicle, like skylon or one of a hundred other vehicles should be backed by the international space program.
 
Back
Top Bottom