Red Arrow crashes near Bournemouth

Associate
Joined
22 Aug 2006
Posts
2,007
Location
Location
Cu3ed apologies for my out burst, I've spent the past 2 days sat on base here in Lincoln watching it all unfold on the news seeing newspapers and tv channels spiel out so much bull **** about something they really know not a lot about, just repeating what they hear on twitter/facebook etc. It really does make me sick.

Whilst I've been speaking to friends in Bournemouth who have seen events unfold and have now told there experiences to me.

It will be awkward in work tomorrow. :(
 
Associate
Joined
14 Aug 2004
Posts
1,979
Location
In a bar, gettin' ******
Saddened even more that the display wasn't part of the routine. They deviated at the end to put on an "agreed" mini display to the Bournemouth Airport Tower and spectators waiting at the airport to say "thanks" for having them, which they choose to do upon their approach fairly last minute (although as I say, it had been agreed that it could be done if the RAs wanted to, which they did). They just didn't decide until shortly before they were clear to land. It's amazing how one small decision can lead to such a sad event.
The didn't put on any kind of 'agreed' mini display at all, that is rubbish.

They did a flat run in and break over the airfield the same as they do at other airfields they visit. There was nothing unusual about it.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Sep 2008
Posts
14,129
Location
Britain
Really, just the SQ Leader was on the local radio and said they had decided to do a fly by at the airport which they weren't going to originally do, then bank back around for the final approach. It was in the bank after the fly by where Red 4 didn't come back up. It was on the Echo website, so again, how accurate that is is anyones guess.
 
Associate
Joined
14 Aug 2004
Posts
1,979
Location
In a bar, gettin' ******
Red 4 went down after breaking from the formation to land.
Basically they pull off from the formation left and right as they fly along the runway and do a turn back to fly downwind then eventually turning again to land individually either side of the centre line of the runway.
I believe they pull a few G's when doing the initial break, but couldn't accurately say how many G it involves.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Jan 2006
Posts
12,330
Location
Belfast
Cu3ed apologies for my out burst, I've spent the past 2 days sat on base here in Lincoln watching it all unfold on the news seeing newspapers and tv channels spiel out so much bull **** about something they really know not a lot about, just repeating what they hear on twitter/facebook etc. It really does make me sick.

Whilst I've been speaking to friends in Bournemouth who have seen events unfold and have now told there experiences to me.

It will be awkward in work tomorrow. :(

No worries mate, I understand.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Dec 2005
Posts
12,488
Location
Bath
Anyone seen this? http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16056204


16056058.jpg
 
Associate
Joined
22 Aug 2006
Posts
2,007
Location
Location
Its called the lower anti collision strobe light situated just in front of the air brake and between the air brake strakes, the photo is taken just as its flashing.

Quite a few newspapers are running this story claiming its fire, or more stupidly the plane being downed.

Idiots.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Dec 2004
Posts
18,874
Location
Telford
Deffinately looks like the Anti col. When they display they fly with them off so it could have been triggered (fault) or just accidently set to on. I imagine there will be lots of reports of major electrical failure soon...
 
Associate
Joined
22 Aug 2006
Posts
2,007
Location
Location
Whilst I'm not aware of aviation flying rules, they where technically "transiting" from Bournemouth Seafront to the Airport. Each transit has a "Nav" (One of the pilots) in charge of getting them from A to B. They don't use the anti cols in the display, but I'm guessing that at least one of the pilots has to have anti cols on during the transit, even if it was such a small one as this one was.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
24 Dec 2004
Posts
18,874
Location
Telford
Sounds about right to me, I don't have much info on flying rules as i'm just an engineer. Tbh if you can't see a big group of bright red planes coming your way then you probarbly should not be flying.
 
Associate
Joined
22 Aug 2006
Posts
2,007
Location
Location
You would be surprised on the amount of idiots there are in the air.

2 of our planes almost met a Cessna mid air who wanted a closer look whilst breaking to land at Dunsfold Aerodrome in June.

Watching from the ground was definitely one of those "Oh my ******* god" moments.

They also had to cancel a display half way through last year at Silverstone for the BTCC, as a group of gliders from Bicester thought they would come and have a look.

*edit*

Our bosses little rant about the gliders.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/reds/teamnews/index.cfm?storyid=A9119FF0-5056-A318-A8054E383083343D
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
19,336
Location
Somewhere in the middle.
Jay on the Reds is your relationship with Aircrew quite close?, As a liney on tornados I barely know the names of any Aircrew, and I couldnt call any of them friends. We certainly dont mingle with one-another.
 
Associate
Joined
22 Aug 2006
Posts
2,007
Location
Location
We are very close, every day during the morning brief they have, they have a powerpoint slide "Engineer of the day" with one of the Techies photos, his/hers name, raf history and nickname if they have one.

We do everything together as a squadron, be it getting drunk on exercise, meals, parties etc.

Some of the aircrew don't even mind not being called Sir or Ma'am, we can happily call them by there first names / nicknames out on the flight line. But when we are in the public eye we have to call them Sir or Ma'am.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
19,336
Location
Somewhere in the middle.
We are very close, every day during the morning brief they have, they have a powerpoint slide "Engineer of the day" with one of the Techies photos, his name, raf history and nickname if they have one.

We do everything together as a squadron, be it getting drunk on exercise, meals, parties etc.

Some of the aircrew don't even mind not being called sir or ma'am, we can happily call them by there first names / nickenames out on the flight line. But when we are in the public eye we have to call them Sir or Ma'am.

Thats very different to life on 617 and 15sqn thats for sure :), I had a feeling the reds were run in a more personal way by the way they conduct themselves and do everything. Watching them land in sequence and even be seen in, at a specific pace and time was quite impressive.
 
Associate
Joined
22 Aug 2006
Posts
2,007
Location
Location
Very interesting Jay. I'm sure there are a lot of huge ego's to deal with though.

If your on about the pilots this isn't the case, they are all down to earth, relaxed people who have no sign of an ego problem.

There was a right **** on the team last year though. :p Who just looked down on groundcrew with his snobby attitude.
 
Back
Top Bottom