Caporegime
Lucky it was a slap and he didn't cut off his head screaming praise allahn .
Whose allahn??...never heard of the bloke...
Lucky it was a slap and he didn't cut off his head screaming praise allahn .
What about free speech for MAC?
They are ancient texts, there is little can be done about that now. It is from a distant time, it's how people make it relevent to modern day that is the issue.
Venting at the text itself is irrelevent.
Well it isn't as simple as 'its them, its their book and nothing else'.
Which is often argued, implied and what not else.
What about people who commit crazy acts without religious externalities?
Again, it is a minority and it can be combatted well away from cruising about in cars videotaping the heathen swines.
I support that too.
That is the problem, they're societal operating systems from the distant past and should have nothing to do with how our civilisations run. Sadly not everyone agrees...
Quite the opposite, I'd rather attack the source of the problem and not its symptoms.
Arguing foreign policy would take a new thread, a few essays and a hell of a lot of tin foil.
What about them? I'm interested in intellectually attacking any perceived threats to our way of life. Islamofascism is most certainly one of the biggest threats, quite how that changes our stance is another matter entirely though.
Let's say Israel bombs Iran or at worse the US decides it has to free the **** out of them, can you see Muslims in this country not speaking out against them? Of course there is a difference between speaking out against foreign policy and Islamism, but one could quite easily lead into the other.
Argumentum ad nauseam. It isn't correct from their mindset, how is videotaping fighting back? They aren't a political movement they are a "street protest group" with a penchant for violence and thuggery. The correct response would have been not to create the situation, and not incite religious and racial hatred.
I must be very dull All I see in this thread is a Muslim assaulting a man in a car because he was losing an argument and Biohazard praising the violence
without giving a coherent answer to any question along with others performing bitchy sniping and personal insults without discussion of what is asked. Do people not realise the world would be boring if we all held the same belief, but it does nothing for your credibility to use personal insults and whiny sniping when you can't put forward a logical counter argument?
I don't believe they officially endorse violence rather you seem to have interpreted 'fight back' at face value. I don't doubt that they are full of mindless racist thugs but I'd also point out that your original comment was rather mindless too. You also seem to have issues with women.
Whose allahn??...never heard of the bloke...
Idiot 1 provokes idiot 2. Idiot 2 smacks idiot 1. Is that about the size of it?
A minority disagrees.
Why attack a religious text? It is only ever going to inflame the situation surely you have the accumen to see this?
We have all the cyberspace in the world. Foreign policy is a component structure of the problem we have, successive Governments have had advice as such. They are fully aware of the risks they take.
One of the biggest threats? I doubt it.
There is correlation none the less.
I'd say thankfully, but the fact that ANY do is cause for concern.
Ideally I'd like everyone to respect other people's beliefs, but in a world of militant evangelism, I like to fight back. I'm an evangelical agnostic, I believe people should question the foundations of their belief systems. Hopefully the power of religion over world politics can disappear, but that'll only happen with people attacking it.
One of my worries is that our foreign policy is necessitated by our economic paradigm. A paradigm that breaks down without access to cheap plentiful oil...
Depends how you discern threats I guess.
Crazy people will always commit crazy acts, the bigger problem appears when 'sane' people are led by crazy people following crazy ideologies. You try and fit a faltering world structure in with a messianic religion that believes in the apocalypse, it doesn't really bear thinking about (and sadly the Americans are in almost the same bracket).
Yes. Bitchslapped to be precise.
Isn't that the truth! When those EDL mugs go rah, rah, rah in towns it's the locals who get the **** kicked out of them after they have left.Yes, the world is a dangerous place. The EDL don't make it any safer.
Yes. Bitchslapped to be precise.
You just come across as Muslim defender and support a Muslim hitting a white man in his car, what is your religion, why are people so scared to say what religion they follow.
Again with the wink, you think its ok for someone to be attacked.
You don't have to be Muslim to defend their faith, that's just simplistic logic.
How exactly did he provoke him? Being white in a Muslim area?