**IVY BRIDGE IN STOCK & AVAILABLE NOW!!**

Soldato
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Posts
6,150
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
Associate
Joined
20 Nov 2010
Posts
739
Location
Sunny Hull
I hear those run pretty hot when OC'd so people with average cooling may be better off with the Sandy's if they were to seek high overclocks. I'd be nice if one of the OCUK guys run some tests and show us what temps they are getting on air, closed loops and custom water.
I'm tempted to go try myself, but i'm sure the guys at OCUK will do far better job than I would. ;)
 
Permabanned
Joined
24 Mar 2012
Posts
7,051
Location
Ulster
Are these mobile processors similar to the old Athlon XP-M?

According to wikipedia, there's S, T and K for the desktop. K as we know is unlocked. S is low power (65w TDP) and T is ultra low power (35-45w).

For mobile there's M, Q, U and X.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture)#List_of_Ivy_Bridge_processors

I imagine the S versions will go in the default Ivy Bridge Mac builds (as they have done since the mid 2011 models). I'm sure Asus and Sony use the S SandyBridge chips in some of their all-in-ones as well (I haven't checked their specs in a while).

The T chips will probably find their way into mini-itx and other HTPC setups.

Edit 2: SandyBridge had similar suffixes. I suppose as the Ivy Bridge catalogue expands so to will the suffix list.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
7 Sep 2010
Posts
535
About time we see prices!

Although i must admit,I was expecting the whole Ivy bridge line to be cheaper. :/

Really? I was hoping they might be cheaper, but realistically why would Intel discount these when :
They're faster than Sandybridge (not by much except the iGPU)
They're lower power too
There's absolutely no competition from AMD

It's not a large enough leap to make me consider upgrading my 2500K, but for new builds it's a no-brainer IMHO. Maybe Sandybridge prices will drop somewhat now, but until AMD get their act together, Intel can do whatever they want with their pricing.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 May 2003
Posts
11,865
Location
Hamilton
Mike, if it helps... the technology in the t chips is the same as the normal chips, they just have limits put on them to keep them within the thermal and power package. When I was planning my HTPC I did look at them but the advice I got was that they're suitable if you're a system builder and want to pick a TDP/power consumption, but for an end user they're not so great.

I'd go for a system with a PWM CPU fan set carefully so that it is silent except if there's a need for it, and I'd go for a normal CPU. That way the only time you'll hear it is when the CPU is under such sustained load that it gets to build up heat, and at that time I think I'd suffer a little noise for the extra computing power. The alternative is that your system runs hot under load but silent, and less powerful.

Ivy Bridge is Ivy Bridge, there's nothing different about them other than the limits imposed to keep them within the tighter spec.
 
Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,422
Location
2nd City - Manchester.
Hopefully they will sort out the heat issues and spend the extra 2-3c/unit on the cement for the IHS rather than some cheap zinc paste - nobody needs things to be 20c hotter at the same speed as SB.

Either way I'm out until at least IB-E and probably H-E.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Dec 2002
Posts
10,165
Location
Minehead
2700k it is for me after the above reply. I don't need pcie 3 anyway as I have two 5850's which will and do sit quite happily in pciex 2 and 8x8.

I don't really want one that can't clock anywhere near a sb cpu.
 
Back
Top Bottom