I am not a feminist nor do I care for the plight of women, blacks, disabled or any number of inferior groups who feel they are not treated equally.
http://i.imgur.com/xnpZN.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Any chance you could make that a bit bigger? Not sure if I can read it from the other side of the office car park.
Also, you realise you could virtually the same diagram about men, with the same negative responses?
You do also realise that some of us who are not feminists do not hold those opinions, and in fact hold the same opinions as your "feminist" diagram?
Bull. The world would be pretty much the same as it is now because the same conditions would apply. You'd have short-term changes if there was a sudden radical change, such as a feminist group successfully seizing power as an absolute oligarchy or dictactorship, but in the long run nothing would change. Any short-term changes would be due to the sudden radical change, not due to the sex of the oligarchs. The only way you'd get a lasting change would be if they were extreme enough to "phase out" maleness entirely, or maybe (as the slightly less extreme ones advocate), cull male people down to a manageable minority to use as breeding animals and for dangerous work.
Give it another decade or two and the stereotype of men being illogical and addled by hormones will probably be dominant. Feminism has already been very successful to strengthening existing anti-male stereotypes, so now it's well on the way to reversing old anti-female stereotypes and making them anti-male ones.
EDIT: Also why is it a woman can slap me and nothing be thought of it, but if I were to slap a woman as hard as some of them slap i'd be prosecuted. You want equal rights women, you can bloody have them.
Why are women paid the same prize money at Wimbledon when they do less work for it?
Also holy lol at the dude who used an analytical example of a homeless man and the Prime minister of Germany, completely ignoring the makeup of the amount of men in politics vs women.
The law treats both equally. Assault is assault regardless of who is doing it.
Why are women paid the same prize money at Wimbledon when they do less work for it?
Go find a homeless man living rough on the streets and tell him he's more powerful than Angela Merkel and then I'll have a little bit of respect for you since you'd be standing behind your stated beliefs about how men (unqualified, i.e. all men) have special power and privilege denied to women (unqualified, i.e. all women). I'd still think you're a bigot and a loony, but I'd think you have some honesty and integrity to go with it.
You live in a society where if a woman attacks a man it is routinely assumed that the man is the abuser and the woman is the victim. Even if she maims and mutilates him, it's commonly seen as being funny as well as his fault. It's even more sexist than the reality of the medieval example I referred to. To claim equality in either case is simply wrong.
You live in a society where if a woman attacks a man it is routinely assumed that the man is the abuser and the woman is the victim. Even if she maims and mutilates him, it's commonly seen as being funny as well as his fault. It's even more sexist than the reality of the medieval example I referred to. To claim equality in either case is simply wrong.
The law treats both equally. Assault is assault regardless of who is doing it.