Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
i've read about next gen consoles that there might not be such a big jump in graphic.
That's true, their wasn't much of a big jump between the Xbox and Xbox 360. Apart from games looking abit more shiny, halo is a good example of this.
But whatever next gen consoles bring, will still be abit 'meh' as we have it all on PC for years.
Heh, every few months one of these Q6600 threads pop up and I end up saying the same thing . None of the games I play are having a problem with my Q6600@3GHz + GTX470, so there is really no need for me to upgrade. For example, I just started playing Skyrim, with all on high 4xAA and 4xAF and I get 38-42FPS which is more than enough for me. I can also play Assassin's Creed Revelations on full and it's nice and smooth (haven't checked FPS yet though). These games are going to take me ages to finish, so there is no point for me to upgrade. The biggest improvement, like many have said, is to just get an SSD (or 2).
I don't see any must have games coming up which will push PCs like Crysis did either. The only one I am really looking forward to is Bioshock:Infinite anyway, and I believe that is on some version of the UE3 engine (looks like it), so should run fine on my PC.
If you wait till haswell you'll just go "go haswell or wait for broadwell?/skylake" etc etc etc.
If you wait till haswell you'll just go "go haswell or wait for broadwell?/skylake" etc etc etc.
Or you could just constantly upgrade and waste all your money instead.