Arrested for posting pictures

Soldato
Joined
22 Sep 2011
Posts
10,575
Location
Portsmouth (Southsea)
We've seen a huge erosion in moral values in this country in the past 100 years
You mean since women got votes, black people got votes, disabled people got care, we created a safety net for the vulnerable & a health-care system system for the poor?.

I think you will find this current society is considerably more moral than it was 100 years ago.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
7 Jan 2012
Posts
1,918
Location
Liverpool
So if they arrest the dude who posted the burning poppy picture, shouldn't I be arrested for posting this picture as I am sure there will be a much larger group of people that will moan about it.

417021_10151395590025790_2040381657_n.jpg
 
Associate
Joined
16 Jul 2008
Posts
2,241
Offending someone should not be a crime in itself. If the act is otherwise criminal then by all means arrest them but not solely because someone takes offence.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Nov 2002
Posts
7,501
Location
pantyhose factory
I'm not advocating a totalitarian state - I'm simply saying that the correct action was taken in this case. His behaviour would be morally repugnant to the majority of people in this country, and he is in clear breach of the Communications Act 2003.

We've seen a huge erosion in moral values in this country in the past 100 years - I'm not prescribing state run moral values, but I think there should be action available to the police / CPS in cases of gross moral outrage. The guy peeing on the cenotaph, for example.

define gross moral outrage, and then define how the government can legislate against that without having the equivalent of the Stasi running around telling us what to think.

Its impossible without seeing freedoms curtailed for all. You are asking for totalitarianism but then trying to set boundaires on it.This is not possible.
 
Associate
Joined
27 Jan 2011
Posts
1,478
It could be reasonable or not depending on the entire context. If he went onto a remembrance group and posted it along with some inflammatory language then it's closer to the mark than say, someone who shares a photoshopped picture on their profile page with some poignant comment about how what we fought for in WWII is being eroded/destroyed. Regardless though, back in the day you used to be able to just block people or ban them from a site and that was that. No needs for arrests.
 

RDM

RDM

Soldato
Joined
1 Feb 2007
Posts
20,612
I think you will find this current society is considerably more moral than it was 100 years ago.

Indeed, I would in fact struggle to think of any time where I would rather live in the UK than now. I certainly wouldn't want to turn the clock back to 1912.

As to the OP, for me it would depend on where the message was posted. If it was posted specifically to a remembrance page then it could easily be construed as being deliberately offensive and should be dealt with in the same way as someone going to a funeral and shouting offensive remarks should be dealt with.

If it was his own wall however then I would disagree that he had committed an offence.

However the law seems to be relatively consistent, if burning a copy of the Koran is enough to get you arrested so should burning a poppy be.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
7 Jan 2012
Posts
1,918
Location
Liverpool
Even if he did post it on a remembrance FB page, maybe he is a pacifist and it represents a glorification of war and that the poppy offends him.
 
Associate
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Posts
523
Location
Sheffield UK
one more step for sharia law, only a few more to the giant leap for england.

There were a group of islamic protesters the broke the silence and burnt a poppy wreath in the middle of london on rememberance sunday at 11 oclock inciting hatred and spouting filth... the police did nothing... a white man jumped the police barrier and tried to smash thier faces in ... he was arrested... i agree violance is not the answer... but claiming jihad(the violent subjection of everyone but muslims) in the middle of the street is not a peaceful protest, they were inciting hatred and trying to cause a riot.

we are slowly losing the battle due to inaction...i cannot say how we should proceed, but this is not it
 

RDM

RDM

Soldato
Joined
1 Feb 2007
Posts
20,612
Even if he did post it on a remembrance FB page, maybe he is a pacifist and it represents a glorification of war and that the poppy offends him.

That's neither here nor there really, he would have been fully aware that his post was likely to cause offense and going out of his way to do so. Generally we try to dissuade that sort of behaviour, the fact that he has done it online is pretty immaterial.

It all depends on context to be honest and without the full details of why, how and what he did then I can't really say if the police action is justified or not.
 

RDM

RDM

Soldato
Joined
1 Feb 2007
Posts
20,612
Could you talk me through how you came to the conclusion that it's more moral to kidnap somebody than to burn a poppy please?

It isn't kidnapping. I know in your libertarian utopia it would be classed as kidnapping, but in the UK being arrested by the police doesn't constitute kidnapping.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jul 2006
Posts
3,371
Location
Hell!! \m/
I think it stupid and wrong however he is expressing his opinion.

Agaist gays, blacks or even Tony Williams. He aint hurting them like harming people psyically but he is asking for trouble n upsettin' people.

Eitherway he bought the Poppy so donates a pound aye?
 
Back
Top Bottom