The Red Bull Racing Story: 2005-2012

Soldato
Joined
20 Apr 2007
Posts
3,467
'We turned up with a metric ****ton of money and brought two teams where we used a complete disregard of the rule book to easily win a few titles with the worlds most punchable team manager and a brat of a driver'.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
13,308
Location
Belfast
'We turned up with a metric ****ton of money and brought two teams where we used a complete disregard of the rule book to easily win a few titles with the worlds most punchable team manager and a brat of a driver'.
Don't hold back dalin, tell us what you really feel.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jan 2011
Posts
1,737
Location
Inverness, Scotland
'We turned up with a metric ****ton of money and brought two teams where we used a complete disregard of the rule book to easily win a few titles with the worlds most punchable team manager and a brat of a driver'.

lol u mad :D

Seriously though, RBR are the only team to ever push the rules for an advantage? You must be new to F1.
 
Caporegime
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
31,714
Location
Cambridge
Kudos to Red Bull for pushing the little team come good angle despite having a huge amount of money. They played it well, but then what do you expect from people that market a 5p drink for £1 a can and still sell billions despite everyone making stuff with near identical ingredients for 30p a can.

The early days of Red Bull racing was marketed and publised very very well. The happy go lucky team, pleased to be there, having fun and the joke pre-race noted released, while they mopped up talent and spent a huge amount of money.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
Isn't the RBR budget actually smaller than McLaren, Ferrari and Mercedes?

Sure, the company behind them might actually have a gazillion in the bank, but it doesn't mean they actually spent it all on the F1 team.

Money doesn't buy success either. Does it, Toyota?
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Oct 2004
Posts
3,163
Location
Manchester
Isn't the RBR budget actually smaller than McLaren, Ferrari and Mercedes?

Sure, the company behind them might actually have a gazillion in the bank, but it doesn't mean they actually spent it all on the F1 team.

Money doesn't buy success either. Does it, Toyota?

No, it's larger. They keep getting around the spending agreements as well unlike McLaren & Ferrari.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
No, it's larger. They keep getting around the spending agreements as well unlike McLaren & Ferrari.

You mean Ferrari who left FOTA at the same time as RBR so are no longer subject to the RRA?

There's always got to be some excuse though. RBR only win because "they have infinate money" or because "they broke all the rules" or because "Newey is the only person in F1 who can build fast cars"

Could it not just be that they did the best job? :D
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
Probably a lot less than the top guys from all the manufacturer teams were on in the first half of the 00s. The amount of money being plowed into F1 back then was eye watering.
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
18,543
Location
UK
Could it not just be that they did the best job? :D

Yep, while I'm not Red Bulls biggest fan, it's clear that their approach is to push to the maximum in everything they do. Bend the rules perhaps, but I don't think they break them.

McLaren ever since spygate seem to have been too conservative, Ferrari just had several foul-ups over their wind tunnel etc., and the other teams just didn't have the expertise in place to compete at the very top.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Nov 2005
Posts
45,276
Isn't the RBR budget actually smaller than McLaren, Ferrari and Mercedes?

Sure, the company behind them might actually have a gazillion in the bank, but it doesn't mean they actually spent it all on the F1 team.

Money doesn't buy success either. Does it, Toyota?

toyota didnt have 2 teams worth of data and a sister team doing testing for them instead of racing
 
Back
Top Bottom