I respect your opinion but why do you believe that?
What i think is, if you're dog gets lost, its better for both you and the dog to be able to track the owner down.
I respect your opinion but why do you believe that?
14 people dead in 7 years (not many of them being a baby either). When you think of the number of dogs in this country, it hardly seems a major issue and does point to most dog owners being responsible and/or most dogs not being dangerous in the first place.
A chip covers this.
shoot1st, please share your pet microchip conspiracy theory with me. I genuinely want to here more on this subject.
e: In detail I mean
Does an ID collar not do that already?
Don't be silly, a collar can fall off and/or be taken off!
Compulsory chipping is a great idea and one that should have been implemented many years ago!
Will help stop irresponsible cold hearted people just chucking dogs out when they realize it's a lot more responsibility then they first thought in their silly little heads
Equally no evidence to the contraryThat's a loaded question if ever I saw one. I'll stick with the possibility of health issues, overall cost of this to the tax payer and agreeing with the Scottish government...
"The Scottish government has said that, while it recognised the benefits of microchipping, there was "no evidence compulsory microchipping would effectively tackle welfare issues"."
Yeah but who's going to take the collar off? Not the dog owner. If a collar falls off a dog then you're either using the collar incorrectly or do not have the right collar for the dog.
Seems to me like the weak link in this is the owner. Perhaps potential owners should be vetted more carefully.
So in the last few years of my dogs life after untold years of good keeping I have to take him & get a tiny capsule injected into his skin, Great. (Legit rolleyes )
Can't see this penalising anybody but decent owners as ***** who don't care now won't care then.
S'pose it just opens the way for them being able to exterminate as many strays as poss.
Yeah but who's going to take the collar off? Not the dog owner. If a collar falls off a dog then you're either using the collar incorrectly or do not have the right collar for the dog.
Seems to me like the weak link in this is the owner. Perhaps potential owners should be vetted more carefully.
Nonsense, hundreds of owners take collars off and abandon poor dogs every year Plus like everything dog collars aren't perfect and occasionally break and fall off not to mention they can also get caught on stuff and pulled off!!!
Heard this on the news this morning, I don't have a dog but seemed logical enough.
The only thing I thought of though was when they said there was a dog that had been left at the rescue centre on New Year's Day and that if it had been chipped they could find its owner.
Well, if all dogs get chipped wont that discourage people from leaving them at suitable centres and instead dumping them elsewhere? Or worse? Or do they think it will just stop people trying to abandon dogs all together?
You know some people steal dogs? I would suspect they would take a collar off before selling it on.
You're definitely going to take the collar off your dog if you want to abandon it somewhere, obviously. But if you want to abandon a dog that is chipped does the chip stop you from doing so? Is it gauranteed to stop dogs being abandoned? I don't think it does.
I have had dogs all my life and have never had a collar snap, or a lead, or a collar come off. I never leave my dog anywhere that could see her get into any trouble, i.e. go missing or kidnapped or whatever. I don't see why I should be forced to get a chip implanted in my dog when it is not going to benefit me or the dog.
Yes I know some people steal dogs but I'm not so sure a chip is going to stop that from happening.