Well, the new Razer Blade series are here... and they are somewhat head-scratching in their configurations:
------------------------------------------
Razer Blade
14" IGZO IPS 16:9 3200x1800 Touchscreen http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-systems/razer-blade
Nvidia Geforce GTX 870M
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
8GB DDR3
Razer Blade Pro http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-systems/razer-blade-pro
17" IPS 1080p non-touchscreen
Nvidia Geforce GTX 860M
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
16GB DDR3
------------------------------------------
I simply can't help thinking that Razer got these machines a little mixed up...
The 14" Razer Blade was screaming out to have an IPS 1080p panel and the 860M because it is a small machine and so the 1080p screen would have been perfectly fine, and the 860M would have kept it cool with good battery life. the last model was a hot mama with the 765M, so Lord knows what this is going to be like with a 100w TDP 870M in a small chassis!
Conversely, the 17" Razer Pro was screaming out to have the QHD+ panel and the 870M, where the large screen size would definitely see dpi benefit from that resolution, and the increased chassis and airflow would have greatly suited the hot 870M. I know they say this is also a "productivity" machine, but come on... it's a gaming machine, if people want productivity they buy a business laptop.
By doing these spec configs, I think Razer have effectively made the Razer Pro underpowered and redundant vs the smaller and more portable laptop. The designers really need to get a slap on the wrist for that, because it is going to lose then a ton of Blade Pro sales I think.
------------------------------------------
Razer Blade
14" IGZO IPS 16:9 3200x1800 Touchscreen http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-systems/razer-blade
Nvidia Geforce GTX 870M
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
8GB DDR3
Razer Blade Pro http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-systems/razer-blade-pro
17" IPS 1080p non-touchscreen
Nvidia Geforce GTX 860M
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
16GB DDR3
------------------------------------------
I simply can't help thinking that Razer got these machines a little mixed up...
The 14" Razer Blade was screaming out to have an IPS 1080p panel and the 860M because it is a small machine and so the 1080p screen would have been perfectly fine, and the 860M would have kept it cool with good battery life. the last model was a hot mama with the 765M, so Lord knows what this is going to be like with a 100w TDP 870M in a small chassis!
Conversely, the 17" Razer Pro was screaming out to have the QHD+ panel and the 870M, where the large screen size would definitely see dpi benefit from that resolution, and the increased chassis and airflow would have greatly suited the hot 870M. I know they say this is also a "productivity" machine, but come on... it's a gaming machine, if people want productivity they buy a business laptop.
By doing these spec configs, I think Razer have effectively made the Razer Pro underpowered and redundant vs the smaller and more portable laptop. The designers really need to get a slap on the wrist for that, because it is going to lose then a ton of Blade Pro sales I think.
Last edited: