I've dropped a clanger.
New driveway planning approved last year, alongwith dropped kerb approval from highways.
I included a trench drain+soakaway in plans on front boundary, but also (stupidly) stated that I'd use a porus surface on driveway.
Issue is, the drive will be on a significant gradient (leading down to road), and therefore the porus sub-base + asphalt are not suitable (>~1/20 gradient apparently).
Given that highways have approved the road saftey aspect, no neighbours complained, the design was sound (other than the surface) - is it worth just building the thing with MOT-1 & non-porus asphalt and then applying for retrospective planning?
Worth a conversation with the duty planners first, perhaps? An 8 week delay for revised approval would be an issue.
New driveway planning approved last year, alongwith dropped kerb approval from highways.
I included a trench drain+soakaway in plans on front boundary, but also (stupidly) stated that I'd use a porus surface on driveway.
Issue is, the drive will be on a significant gradient (leading down to road), and therefore the porus sub-base + asphalt are not suitable (>~1/20 gradient apparently).
Given that highways have approved the road saftey aspect, no neighbours complained, the design was sound (other than the surface) - is it worth just building the thing with MOT-1 & non-porus asphalt and then applying for retrospective planning?
Worth a conversation with the duty planners first, perhaps? An 8 week delay for revised approval would be an issue.