[TW]Fox;29397048 said:
It's not a 'fallacy' at all. A van or a lorry is a pointless and stupid personal vehicle.
I've no interest in owning an SUV but I have driven a few - some for quite some distance as I've been given them as rental cars when my preferred saloon wasn't available, and there is something about the driving experience that is enjoyable. It isn't 'superiority complex' because there is no 'superiority' to be had driving a rented car in a country you don't live in and where you don't know anyone.
It's amusing to see you constantly attacking anyone whose choice of car type doesn't mirror your own. Not everyone wants to drive a BMW saloon. I do, you do, others do not.
Pot kettle for a start. Who exactly have i attacked? All I've stated is that the blokes Mrs is going for a crap choice of cars due to a daft requirement that in most people can be put down to a simple psychological need to try to be superior by physically looking down on others.
How exactly are vans stupid? They have multiple seats, great storage and can look pretty good!
I agree lorries as a personal vehicle generally are stupid but hey, if the requirement is driving position being 'high up' as it seems to be then they fit the bill perfectly. After all, that's the only requirement we've been given and is the apparent reason for her choice of an suv.