1: He isn't in prison in the Embassy, he is in hiding and is free to leave whenever he wishes.
2: Generally when people jump bail the result is arrest yes.
3: He wouldn't be flown to a prison in Sweden, he would be taken to a police station to be interviewed. This would result in wither his arrest or release.
4: If charged his trial would be in accordance with the law (and take place in a first world country with the eyes of the world on it), there would be nothing "dodgy" about it.
5: He would not be transferred to the USA, that is an impossibility as has been mentioned multiple times in this thread.
1. So you are saying he would not be arrested if he left the embassy
2. So he would be arrested based on bail that was levied based on zero charges. Wonderful
3. So he would be arrested. You do know there are no charges (despite earlier erroneous statements)
4. We could hope for that
5. It is not an impossibility. In fact it was posted in the other Assange thread by a Swedish Professor in Law that Sweden could in fact tailor make a rendition request. Other posters have mentioned Sweden being used as a jump for extra-judicial transfers (wording is a wonderful thing in Law)
Virtually the entire case can be proven as a sham against him. Even someone else posting a "debunking" has in its own parts debunked itself and some shown to be wrong. Other points have had internet sleuths disprove and final points don't really draw heavily enough on the case.