Fantasy Series

Soldato
Joined
19 Jan 2005
Posts
2,727
Location
Oxford/Bristol
Second vote for the Witcher series. Also the Watch books by Sergei Lukyanenko. If you dig Russian stuff you've probably already read them.
Bernard Cornwell does some pretty good dark ages 'historical' fiction which might as well be fantasy books. The Warlord Chronicles (Arthurian, Complete) start with the Winter King and are a great read. The Saxon Chronicles (ongoing, Alfred) are more formulaic and Uhtred is kind of a dip****.
Warhammer pretty much defines grimdark and some of the earlier novels are surprisingly readable. The Vampire Genevieve (Written by Kim Newman under the alias Jack Yeovil) and the Felix and Gotrek series (Bill King) are worth hunting around for.

Richard K Morgan has written some fantasy. I read the Steel Remains and didn't think it was a patch on his Kovacs stuff, YMMV.
If you liked Banks and Morgan I'd point you towards Alastair Reynolds and Neal Asher. I can recommend the Skinner where Asher invents an entire ecosystem and then intersperses the story with vignettes of how vicious the local fauna are. Read those sections in a David Attenborough voice for extra enjoyment.:D
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
24 May 2009
Posts
20,154
Location
North East
Second vote for the Witcher series. Also the Watch books by Sergei Lukyanenko. If you dig Russian stuff you've probably already read them.
Bernard Cornwell does some pretty good dark ages 'historical' fiction which might as well be fantasy books. The Warlord Chronicles (Arthurian, Complete) start with the Winter King and are a great read. The Saxon Chronicles (ongoing, Alfred) are more formulaic and Uhtred is kind of a dip****.
Warhammer pretty much defines grimdark and some of the earlier novels are surprisingly readable. The Vampire Genevieve (Written by Kim Newman under the alias Jack Yeovil) and the Felix and Gotrek series (Bill King) are worth hunting around for.

Richard K Morgan has written some fantasy. I read the Steel Remains and didn't think it was a patch on his Kovacs stuff, YMMV.
If you liked Banks and Morgan I'd point you towards Alastair Reynolds and Neal Asher. I can recommend the Skinner where Asher invents an entire ecosystem and then intersperses the story with vignettes of how vicious the local fauna are. Read those sections in a David Attenborough voice for extra enjoyment.:D

I'll have a look at Witcher. I read the first couple of Watch books but something about it just didn't vibe for me (couldn't really put a finger on why) and I gave up.

I read the Cromwell Sharpe series (and just finished the bloke who wrote the Ghengis series) and I did enjoy them. I fancy the fantasy series from the Ghengis author bit with only 1 book published I'll wait.

Read Gotrek and Felix until William King stopped, really enjoyed them.

I've heard a lot about Reynolds. I tried Asher but I wasn't a huge fan, I may revisit though.


Thanks for the tips everyone!
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Posts
7,377
Location
Ankh Morpork
The first two Witcher books are short stories that give Geralt some back story - the real story is from book 3 to book 7, all one continuous story that covers Geralt, Ciri and Yennefer

The long story should tick all your boxes as it's definitely dark and all of the heroes are varying shades of grey
 
Soldato
Joined
2 May 2011
Posts
11,878
Location
Woking
I keep getting stuck on book 3 when he turns into an absurdly whiny **** bag. Is it possible to keep reading the series and skip book 3?

I actually like Hobbs writing it's just Fitz I can't get away with.

Well he ages throughout the series, so he matures I suppose, but he still fights constant internal battles. You might be able to skip book 3, but I doubt it.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
24 May 2009
Posts
20,154
Location
North East
:p

Everyone keeps recommending Hobbs and looking for some way to avoid the worst of Fitz, I don'ind not reading it but everyone always recommends it.

To be fair I'm happy enough with Witcher for now then I'll be moving onto Sandman Slim and with my limited reading time that will get me through a long period before needing to contemplate whether or not to relate Fitz again.
 
Back
Top Bottom