Gamer Girl selling her bathwater?????

[ianh]

I've just done 10 miles on my bike, anyone want to put an offer in for the shower water?

Should you be a pretty 19yo girl on Instagram I'm sure the offers would be piling up - However I don't hold my hopes up that you are

 

[kindai]

Should you be a pretty 19yo girl on Instagram I'm sure the offers would be piling up - However I don't hold my hopes up that you are

Did you just assume

• His gender
• His handsomeness
• His IG status
• How many people would pile up for his used shower water?

 

[Malevolence]

For an extra tenner I can be whatever you want.

 

[foster grant]

Some women sell used knickers and some other people sell fake "used knickers". If there's profit to be made, there will be a seller. If it's not illegal and there isn't overwhelming social pressure against it, there will be more sellers.

Imagine you could sell your underwear for 10x what you paid for it. Lots of profit for very little work. Wouldn't you be tempted? Sure beats working hard for minimum wage or being on the dole, which are the alternatives for most people.

Hmm I'm thinking I could sell me socks maybe

 

[ianh]

Did you just assume

• His gender
• His handsomeness
• His IG status
• How many people would pile up for his used shower water?

O.M.G you BIGOTTED NAZI GENDER-STEREOTYPING RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!! :WIDE_PSYCHOTIC_MAD_EYED_STARE:

Did you just assume [preferred pronoun]'s gender? Get back to the stone age you cave-person!!!!!!!!

am i doin dis rite for 2019 ?

To be fair if Malevolence was a hot 19yo IG girl I'd probably consider a lower end Patreon sign up, especially if there was an OcUK style Haribo sign-up bonus!

 

[Diddums]

Did you just assume

• His gender
• His handsomeness
• His IG status
• How many people would pile up for his used shower water?

You forgot age you noob

For an extra tenner I can be whatever you want.

With pics?

 

[silversurfer]

Should you be a pretty 19yo girl on Instagram I'm sure the offers would be piling up - However I don't hold my hopes up that you are

Going by the rules of supply and demand, my annual bath water should be more valuable and far less diluted. I cant promise it will give you super powers though.
Angilion, travel to the land of the rising sun and they have vending machines for such wonders

 

[Threepwood]

Angilion, travel to the land of the rising sun and they have vending machines for such wonders

Was banned years ago..

 

[dowie]

Was banned years ago..

That isn't quite so clear, wiki seems to suggest that they've been restricted in various prefectures as of 2004:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burusera

Perhaps adding to the confusion there are often reports still of people seeing such machines though maybe they're not selling genuine used goods so as to get around any regulations... or perhaps they're illegal or maybe the regulations/restrictions aren't a complete ban.

 

[Angilion]

She's had her account removed for a mass flagging of "nudity" - she isn't visibly nude on Instagram (only on Patreon/Snapchat from looking into it more) so she isn't in breech of Instagrams nudity rules which is why it'll be back after a manual review. As for dishonest I've no idea what she actually says on Insta but I'd be surprised if she would banned on it just for telling a lie.

She says her work is about gaming, which is dishonest as it's about sex. She's has about as much connection to gaming as an performer wearing a nun's habit in a porn film has to Christianity. She's selling a sexual product, though she might well be careful enough to avoid breaking Instagram's rules on that. I'm sure she's read those rules carefully and tailored her act with the intention of staying within them. She doesn't seem to be at all stupid or careless.

 

[Tone1979]

She says her work is about gaming, which is dishonest as it's about sex. She's has about as much connection to gaming as an performer wearing a nun's habit in a porn film has to Christianity. She's selling a sexual product, though she might well be careful enough to avoid breaking Instagram's rules on that. I'm sure she's read those rules carefully and tailored her act with the intention of staying within them. She doesn't seem to be at all stupid or careless.

her IG account has been banned.. LOL

 

[UberTiger]

If there's profit to be made, there will be a seller.

Spoiler: Piper's Pantie Speech from Orange is the New Black

 

[Bearjamin]

Did you just assume

• His gender
• His handsomeness
• His IG status
• How many people would pile up for his used shower water?

O.M.G you BIGOTTED NAZI GENDER-STEREOTYPING RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!! :WIDE_PSYCHOTIC_MAD_EYED_STARE:

Did you just assume [preferred pronoun]'s gender? Get back to the stone age you cave-person!!!!!!!!

am i doin dis rite for 2019 ?

Too funny!

 

[hurfdurf]

 

[FoxEye]

The fact there is such a big market for this type of thing is really sad, must be so many lonely guys out there that they resort to this.

There are also plenty of lonely guys out there who understand that porn is free

And that fake attention of the kind you have to pay for is meaningless.

It's just as meaningless as the free porn, only it comes with an element of self-delusion at worst, or simply throwing away your money at best (and enabling these girls to get rich in the most ridiculous and parasitic way possible).

 

[FoxEye]

I recall posting that quote some time back.

No victim. Nevertheless, sex offender and jail sentence.

That particular part of the law is logically on the level of criminalising homosexuals (which was quite acceptable in the UK - read up the not too distant treatment of Alan Turing recently promoted to £50 note decoration).

The power of moral outrage to make victimless sexual activities a serious crime continues to this day.

However.

Alan Moore, very famous graphic novel writer, did a graphic novel called Lost Girls which depicts children in sexual acts due to it being a very adult take on childrens stories.

It is permitted in the UK. The author himself describes it as pornography.

Work that one out. Perhaps it's the quality of the images, the plotline behind the porn. Whatever makes it acceptable was apparently lacking in the spank bank of the guy that got a sentence for his hentai.

A law based on moral outrage and ultimately implemented on a matter of opinion not the fact of it being hardcore porn involving fictitious children.

Yeah it's a truly terrible law.

A drawing is a drawing. A cartoon is a cartoon.

And how (among other questions) do you accurately determine the age of a cartoon character?

"They look underage."

So do many adults. The fact is: they aren't even real.

A law that prosecutes and destroys the lives of real people for crimes against fictitious people is - imho - bonkers.

"Slippery slope - I'm sure these people would abuse kids if they had the chance."

So future crime then. You're either condemning them for thought crime or future crime they haven't yet committed. And are just assuming they will commit given enough time and opportunity. Either that or you (possibly unlike them) can't differentiate the real from the fantasy. I hope in that case you aren't playing CoD or BF - you're literally murdering people!

"But... think of the children; both real and pretend ones." Yup, that's where we are now.

As you say, a law based on nothing more than moral outrage from a few puritans who don't like anime/hentai. Who are also probably outraged by a whole range of "deviant" behaviour. Like sex before marriage.

 

[dowie]

Erm... seems like a pretty low standard of "smart enough" if it includes realising that being a prostitute can earn you money.

The smart thing about the person who is the subject of this thread is that she's made far more money than even quite well known pornstars, let alone random whores and she's done so simply through teasing/not actually going fully nude (while obviously not leaving too much to the imagination).

 

[Aedus]

Yeah it's a truly terrible law.

A drawing is a drawing. A cartoon is a cartoon.

And how (among other questions) do you accurately determine the age of a cartoon character?

"They look underage."

So do many adults. The fact is: they aren't even real.

A law that prosecutes and destroys the lives of real people for crimes against fictitious people is - imho - bonkers.

"Slippery slope - I'm sure these people would abuse kids if they had the chance."

So future crime then. You're either condemning them for thought crime or future crime they haven't yet committed. And are just assuming they will commit given enough time and opportunity. Either that or you (possibly unlike them) can't differentiate the real from the fantasy. I hope in that case you aren't playing CoD or BF - you're literally murdering people!

"But... think of the children; both real and pretend ones." Yup, that's where we are now.

As you say, a law based on nothing more than moral outrage from a few puritans who don't like anime/hentai. Who are also probably outraged by a whole range of "deviant" behaviour. Like sex before marriage.

I remember seeing a 4chan green text post about something similar, long story short, it was essentially the guy who posted the green text was asking a Japanese “artist” who drew that kinda of underaged material how they were so good at it. The artist replied “reference” and when asked what he meant, he posted a TOR link, which the guy who posted the green text said he noped out of, and didn’t click it.

Now whether that story is true or not, who knows, it was a green text post on Reddit from 4chan, but if we go on the assumption that it is real for a hypothetical situation, the “victimless” aspect of the argument does take a hit. The reason it’s illegal is meant to be to stop a loop-hole, that if you essentially traced / drew a picture but it came from a real photo, it was okay to have it, which in those instances that does have an actual victim. I’m not claiming that all pictures drawn of that nature are “referenced” or based on an actual photo, but I think the argument is that we don’t know for sure whether it is or isn’t, so we made it all illegal just in case. There’s not that many laws I agree with, especially when it comes to porn, but I think the UK is right in this instance. I don’t disagree with hentai in general, just that particular sub genre of it.

 

[FoxEye]

I remember seeing a 4chan green text post about something similar, long story short, it was essentially the guy who posted the green text was asking a Japanese “artist” who drew that kinda of underaged material how they were so good at it. The artist replied “reference” and when asked what he meant, he posted a TOR link, which the guy who posted the green text said he noped out of, and didn’t click it.

Now whether that story is true or not, who knows, it was a green text post on Reddit from 4chan, but if we go on the assumption that it is real for a hypothetical situation, the “victimless” aspect of the argument does take a hit. The reason it’s illegal is meant to be to stop a loop-hole, that if you essentially traced / drew a picture but it came from a real photo, it was okay to have it, which in those instances that does have an actual victim. I’m not claiming that all pictures drawn of that nature are “referenced” or based on an actual photo, but I think the argument is that we don’t know for sure whether it is or isn’t, so we made it all illegal just in case. There’s not that many laws I agree with, especially when it comes to porn, but I think the UK is right in this instance. I don’t disagree with hentai in general, just that particular sub genre of it.

There already was provision to criminalise drawings taken from real abuse images.

The new law(s) makes any 100% from-your-imagination drawing illegal, where a "reasonable person" might have the impression that the subject was underage.

In addition to this, I believe there are now also law(s) such that persons of legal age in porn that look underage can be considered to be child porn.

The law is now based around the appearance of real or imagined persons whom a "reasonable person" might think is below 18.

So legal porn is now also child porn. As well as cartoons from your imagination being child porn.

UK law is no longer bounded by reality but instead by perception. That is the sad truth.

 

[StriderX]

There already was provision to criminalise drawings taken from real abuse images.

The new law(s) makes any 100% from-your-imagination drawing illegal, where a "reasonable person" might have the impression that the subject was underage.

In addition to this, I believe there are now also law(s) such that persons of legal age in porn that look underage can be considered to be child porn.

The law is now based around the appearance of real or imagined persons whom a "reasonable person" might think is below 18.

So legal porn is now also child porn. As well as cartoons from your imagination being child porn.

UK law is no longer bounded by reality but instead by perception. That is the sad truth.

Oh well, if only people didnt vote for it