Looking at buying a S-max as a family car, put a thread about it a while back but the idea is becoming more developed as we consider it more and think about doing center parcs in Holland for example.
We each have small cars which are perfect for 90% of the time but when we want to go out as family of 5 we take both cars but we're thinking of going further in the uk and into Europe. Plus weekends away and trips out. Hire for a week costs £500, we're talking about doing 2 weeks away this year and already have 2 weekend breaks booked. Same next year most likely.
It won't get more than 5000 miles a year on it and depending on how it works could be ours for a couple of years. Insurance is less than £200 for a year, tax around £300 depending on model. I can do servicing myself, then tyres etc but obviously hope not to have a big ticket item go during ownership.
I'm looking at 3000-4000 and searching gives me cars from 2007 to 2010 and mileage from 60k to 110k. These do seem to go on to 150k miles if looked after so which would you take, an older one that has less miles or an newer one that has say 105k on the clock? I know its a question with a hundred variables but can't make up my mind which way to sway, there are some newer ones with a good spec that have 100k on the clock and some older ones with 70k on the clock... 110k one might be better looked after, the 70k one might just be used as we have, maybe I should be concentrating on service books and number of owners
We each have small cars which are perfect for 90% of the time but when we want to go out as family of 5 we take both cars but we're thinking of going further in the uk and into Europe. Plus weekends away and trips out. Hire for a week costs £500, we're talking about doing 2 weeks away this year and already have 2 weekend breaks booked. Same next year most likely.
It won't get more than 5000 miles a year on it and depending on how it works could be ours for a couple of years. Insurance is less than £200 for a year, tax around £300 depending on model. I can do servicing myself, then tyres etc but obviously hope not to have a big ticket item go during ownership.
I'm looking at 3000-4000 and searching gives me cars from 2007 to 2010 and mileage from 60k to 110k. These do seem to go on to 150k miles if looked after so which would you take, an older one that has less miles or an newer one that has say 105k on the clock? I know its a question with a hundred variables but can't make up my mind which way to sway, there are some newer ones with a good spec that have 100k on the clock and some older ones with 70k on the clock... 110k one might be better looked after, the 70k one might just be used as we have, maybe I should be concentrating on service books and number of owners