New benchmark time: Basemark GPU

[pete910]

That Radeon VII looks pretty low to say it a £900 GPU

Was it ever the 900 mark ?

thought it was the 600 mark tbh

What stands out the most is AMD's OGL drivers just plain suck

Always has and always will

 

[humbug]

With Vulkan these days OGL Sucks.

 

[SkeeterUK]

My results stock pulse 56 with no messin with undervolt etc.

 

[chaparral]

Was it ever the 900 mark ?

thought it was the 600 mark tbh

it at the 1000 mark now https://www.overclockers.co.uk/pc-components/graphics-cards/amd/radeon-rx-vega-7

 

[Spyhop]

This new benchmark was created by ex employees that built 3D Mark.

It looks like it too.

Those lot are obsessed with boat/spaceship hybrids.

Nice quick benchmark to run. OcUK Birthday bargain RX590 scores ~4900 on either Vulkan or DX12.

 

[Alexrose1uk]

Pretty happy with that for a laptop. Same ballpark as a 2070S/Radeon VII.

 

[TNA]

Pretty happy with that for a laptop. Same ballpark as a 2070S/Radeon VII.

Very nice indeed for a laptop. Sounds like an expensive laptop however.

 

[Scania]

11,317 , Pretty happy with that.

DEVICE
Category:
Computers
CPU:
Intel® Core™ i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
Physical CPU #:
1
CPU Cores #:
4
CPU Speed (MHz):
800
GPU family marketing name:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU family:
NVIDIA Corporation GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU:
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti AMP! Extreme Core Edition
GPU Memory (MB):
11264
GPU Driver:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 04-Mar-2020
GPU Driver version:
26.21.14.4259
GPU Memory clock (MHz):
1399.8
GPU Video clock (MHz):
1354
GPU Processor clock (MHz):
1607
Memory amount (GB):
16
Memory speed (MHz):
1200
Memory type:
DDR3 SDRAM
Motherboard:
ASUS Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac)
System name:
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti AMP! Extreme Core Edition Intel® Core™ i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
OS:
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (x64) Build 18363.719
Resolution:
3840x2160
PER FRAME RESULTS
Basemark GPU 1.2 High
Vulkan 1
12 Mar 2020
11:38:14
11317
Configuration: Quality highend, Render resolution 3840x2160, Type OfficialHigh, Compression bc7, Vsync false, Window resolution 3840x2160
80.29 min
160.75 max
113.17 avg

https://powerboard.basemark.com/benchmark-result/724199

Don't know why it reports my CPU Speed as 800Mhz & 4.0Ghz respectively -it's @ 4.8Ghz ???

 

[Alexrose1uk]

Very nice indeed for a laptop. Sounds like an expensive laptop however.

Yes, I was lucky and got 15% off, but not cheap.

Also gets very hot on the CPU in extended use on all cores full load; so may drop the clock speed for all cores slightly to make temps a bit more manageable. Downside of having 8c/16th in a laptop chassis, with the wattage unlocked. Thing uses best part of 100W which is no joke in this space and cooling envelope. Considering pulling it back from 4.1GHz all core to 3.9-4GHz, the frequency drop and likely ensuing voltage drop may help bringing closer back towards power/voltage/heat sweet spot.

Not done that yet though as very few things I use push it that hard for longer periods, so kept optimum performance. Later on I may tinker with a SLIGHT all core drop though as may give better/more consistent performance if throttling begins to come into play. I also have a 3 year warranty though, so if the thing melts itself into oblivion, and they cannot repair, I should get the current equivalent (which will no doubt be improved) or money back.

Looking forward to AMD catching up in laptop, the chips they're bringing with same ballpark performance are sounding like they may run cooler and use substantially less power.

 

[SpudMaster]

My Vega 56

 

[pete910]

it at the 1000 mark now https://www.overclockers.co.uk/pc-components/graphics-cards/amd/radeon-rx-vega-7

Thats OCUK for you,

538 on a particularly large e tailor site

£ 500 - 550 if you look around so the statement stands on the whole

 

[Troezar]

I just get an "unknown error" on all tests after they finish. Seem to run well otherwise, very odd.