Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB - slow?

Associate
Joined
25 Aug 2008
Posts
1,196
Location
York, UK
Hi,

Corsair m.2 drive 240gb has my OS.
Latest firmware.

Just done a quick online test at userbenchmark.com and it states that the drive is 'slower than expected':

Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-£50
8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 162%
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 282 291 291 287 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Sequential:
Read 805
Write 617
Mixed 603
SusWrite 291
129% 579 MB/s

Random:
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 64.9
229% 84.7 MB/s

Deep queue 4k:
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 279
306% 518 MB/s

W10 64bit
What could be the reason for this / how do I fix?


I have a Corsair m.2 1tb drive for games, which is performing to its full speed.


Thanks
 
Soldato
Joined
6 May 2009
Posts
19,923
Another queston for "What motherboard?" I expect (like mine) it will be operating at PCIe 2x instead because of your motherboard, thus limiting it to ~800Mb/s
 
Associate
OP
Joined
25 Aug 2008
Posts
1,196
Location
York, UK
Using the exact same online test, the 1tb m.2 drive scores as follows:

Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB-£170
10,115 User benchmarks, average bench 233%
562GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1625 942 949 958 952 947 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Sequential:
Read 1,486
Write 2,496
Mixed 1,672
SusWrite 1,062
380% 1,679 MB/s

Random 4k:
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 84.7
297% 112 MB/s

Deep queue 4k:
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1,134
839% 1,106 MB/s


I cannot understand why they are so different, cant be the mobo as the 1tb is much faster.
Could it be a setting in W10?

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
22 Apr 2008
Posts
3,875
Location
Bryn Celyn Wales
yeah that's crap that is running badly there. So, that board I think is a PCIE4 so you should be gettign PCIE4 speeds I think... so you should be looking around... I'm running an NMVe through a PCIE3 sot and I'm getting so deffo soemthing up with yours.

Userbench isn't the best when doing these so use Crystal Diskmark or AS SSD Benchmark mate and post scores.

Sabrent.jpg
 
Soldato
Joined
6 May 2009
Posts
19,923
What does CrystalDisk benchmark show?
I didnt notice you were using some random online tool to check speed

Userbenchmark.exe :D Downloading that would be like giving your PC HIV on purpose
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Apr 2008
Posts
3,875
Location
Bryn Celyn Wales
https://ibb.co/5X3sZSf

Checked in the bios and was set on gen4 - changed it to gen3 and speeds have improved
hat seems still to be slow that, I'd expect 3gb read/write on the top line as you can see from mine above, that really is slow BUT saying that, I don't know wjhat spec your NMVe is actually thinking about it... is it the 600 Corsair? With it being a smaller drive it will be slower, but I'd not expect that much slower than say the 1tb etc?
 
Associate
OP
Joined
25 Aug 2008
Posts
1,196
Location
York, UK
510 corsair - 3100 read / 1050 write
So is in line with that

On buying it for OS I didn't realise it was a lot slower 'write' than the 1tb
System is snappy though, so happy with it given the low cost
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Apr 2008
Posts
3,875
Location
Bryn Celyn Wales
510 corsair - 3100 read / 1050 write
So is in line with that

On buying it for OS I didn't realise it was a lot slower 'write' than the 1tb
System is snappy though, so happy with it given the low cost
Ahhh yeah cool, then yeah that's spot on mate and working, yeah I mean slow is relative... tbh in real world use mate you wouldn't notice any difference to mine, benchmarks are meaningless really, so unless you're copying massive files day in day out then you would see any difference betqween our M2 drives. Nice to see your sperfoming to spec now!
 
Associate
OP
Joined
25 Aug 2008
Posts
1,196
Location
York, UK
I only use benchmarks to check that everything is working ok.
My OCD kicked in when I saw that my OS drive was not performing as it should.
Served its purpose, didn't realise it was set to gen4 in bios = changed it to gen3 and all ok again :)
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Apr 2008
Posts
3,875
Location
Bryn Celyn Wales
I only use benchmarks to check that everything is working ok.
My OCD kicked in when I saw that my OS drive was not performing as it should.
Served its purpose, didn't realise it was set to gen4 in bios = changed it to gen3 and all ok again :)
Same here mate you want it performing top notch that's it's capable of, I'm like you if something is below what you think, can't sleep properly, glad youv'e sorted it though!
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Sep 2006
Posts
3,553
Location
West Ewell, Surrey
Just wanted to jump on this thread so apologies for the hijack as I have an MP510 480GB that also holds my OS and my benchmark results seem a bit strange as well, mostly the Writes though.

V5H5eU7.jpg

I have the drive installed in the top m2 slot on my motherboard (B450 Mortar Titanium) after I realised that I had orginally installed it in the bottom slot which only allows half the speed. When it was installed in that slot the Read was halved (as you'd expect) however the write stayed the same at around the 550-600MB/s.

I thought it might be a temperature issue but from the Samsung Magician software it reads the drive at around 50 degrees C so my only other theory is free space.

I have a second NVMe installed in the bottom slot, a WD 500GB Blue and that is recording the correct speeds (1600MB/s Read & 1450MB/s Write) so is there something obvious I'm missing?

Thanks
 
Back
Top Bottom