Soldato
See above
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/33640964/
You call facts an OP-ED and not the government data. Nice.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter wez130
- Start date
- Status
See above
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/33640964/
You call facts an OP-ED and not the government data. Nice.
Was it no reason or the reason you stated directly after in the same sentence?
Soldato
Did you read the other articles how the fraud was happening?
Permabanned
Another for the loony bin. 
What does it matter?
I'm trying to get you to clarify something you wrote.
Was it no reason as you stated.
Or was it for the reason you stated?
Soldato
In which case you won't have any problem providing the proof. That some went astray doesn't prove fraud.
I call shenanigans.
It matters because you are constantly dodging addressing facts provided.
Soldato
I posted 3 cases within 1 week alone. Yet you ignored the facts and proof.
Look, I said months ago I wouldn't respond to you, and to this point I haven't.
Simply put, please stop quoting me, I couldn't care less what you write on here, and unlike the other Trump supporters I don't think you even care about the discussion, it's all about getting attention.
Finally, you are so completely ill equipped to enter any discussion that it's difficult to counter any points you do inadvertently make.
Just last week I was helping my 9 year old with maths homework, she understands %s and significance after a few explanations and exercises. Something you've not managed in 40 odd years on this planet.
Or, if I'm doing you a disservice, and you do understand it, then your ongoing argument about rape is you being deliberately antagonistic and puerile for some unknown reason, though again it's fits with your apparent need for attention.
if you want to know the actual facts you can look here and follow the external research, most if it peer reviewed
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/debunking-voter-fraud-myth
That last point is quite pertinent to any TDS sufferer like Panos who is jumping on poorly sourced and biased news stories of anecdotes.
as we can see, actual voter fraud is so rare it is almost non-existent. at most a few dozen cases out of hundreds of millions of votes cast
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/debunking-voter-fraud-myth
That last point is quite pertinent to any TDS sufferer like Panos who is jumping on poorly sourced and biased news stories of anecdotes.
as we can see, actual voter fraud is so rare it is almost non-existent. at most a few dozen cases out of hundreds of millions of votes cast
Soldato
Right wing CT websites don't spout facts. They create "alternative facts". Find a respected source.
Y'all know Trump doesn't care about any of this right? He's just preparing his excuses so he can say the system is rigged against him in the unlikely event that he loses or that he triumphed over a system that was rigged against him if he wins.
I will put down a tenner right now that if he wins the next election he will not bring about any kind of electoral reform to make mail voting more secure.
I will put down a tenner right now that if he wins the next election he will not bring about any kind of electoral reform to make mail voting more secure.
No they can't, firstly laws are not retroactive, and secondly they'll just change their T&C's to make the account holder responsible for whatever they post and demand contact details so the account holder can actually be held liable.
And no i don't "forget that Twitter is not only Trump" whatever you mean by that, that seems a rather silly thing to say TBH as one of those is a person and the other is a private company, how you think anyone would forget that is beyond imagination, most odd. And it doesn't matter that Twitter is used by other entities, you do know laws passed in America don't apply to the rest of the world, right? That's even if this daft EO makes it that far as it's only intended to fire up his base because even an elementary school pupil could tell you that not abridging of the freedom of speech only applies to congress. Companies, individuals, and even the states themselves are entirely within their right to restrict you freedom of speech however they see fit.
Also what does Biden wanting to revoke section 230 have to do with anything, you probably don't even know what section 230 is or even cared before Trump threw his toys out of the pram.
That is your link I responded to! So you don;t even believe in your own sources?
The government data I posted above, it shows voter fraud to e so rare it is almost nonexistent.
Exactly, he is preparing the groundwork in case he loses. Here is quite a good piece. Its CNN so no doubt will be labelled as fake news. But all referenced with Trump's own tweets and goes into factual voter fraud evidence.
Last edited:
It wasn't me that has issues with %'s.
I was countering those who claimed that either voter fraud is a lie and does not exist or those that think it does exist but it's not an issue.
If you have issues where you cannot converse with people and have to block them, those are insecurities you have to deal with but does not stop me quoting you if I feel the need to.
But is OK for you when left wing CT websites claim to have facts?
Who is the neutral arbiter of what constitutes a 'respected source'.
Your reply is like many others in that you don't like the facts so opposing opinions are all cancelled.
Caporegime
Soldato
Wow, fly off the handle why don't you! That was a large jump to a conclusion that's hilariously incorrect.
Back on topic after your failed attempt at slander ... I'm not aware of any left wing CT websites. Got any examples? The Grauniad doesn't count.
- Status