NVIDIA ‘Ampere’ 8nm Graphics Cards

[Greebo]

Pretty sure the gap at 4K was more than 20% TBF. You might be right, but I’ll be disappointed if you are.

Financially better off, but disappointed.

20% would have been fine if the 3090 had 16gb or 20gb and was priced at £899 though.

I would have happily ponied up the extra for that.

Now paying exactly double for 20% leaves me cold. Even if it clocks higher and the difference is 30% I am not sure I would spend it. I can afford it but it just doesn't make any sense yet.

Would rather buy a £649 3080 and then next year stump up for a 4090 if the extra performance/memory is needed.

 

[jonneymendoza]

I did say a while back the competition this time round was the consoles and this is what Linus agrees with:

See 6:38mins

Which does mean the only really why prices are good and performance fantastic is because we are on the cusp of a generational jump courtesy of the consoles.

Nice, will check this video out

 

[HRL]

Or, we wait until the reviewers get hold of the cards - and don`t put cherry picked `best case` benchmarks

That’s what we’re all waiting for.

The 3090 actually releases on my birthday, which is nice.

 

[HRL]

20% would have been fine if the 3090 had 16gb or 20gb and was priced at £899 though.

I would have happily ponied up the extra for that.

Now paying exactly double for 20% leaves me cold. Even if it clocks higher and the difference is 30% I am not sure I would spend it. I can afford it but it just doesn't make any sense yet.

Would rather buy a £649 3080 and then next year stump up for a 4090 if the extra performance/memory is needed.

Would 40% sway you? Just curious.

 

[opethdisciple]

I do fully expect RDNA2 to feature more vram. But then again if the over all power of the cards are not able to match the 3080 let alone the 3090 then what is the point?

In fact RDNA2 is rumoured I read to feature a 16GB card.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

Its funny people crying saying, the 90s too expensive, when its the same price as some 2080 Tis were, yet it absolutely mullers em, and has a lot more vram

 

[Sargatanas2511]

Its funny people crying saying, the 90s too expensive, when its the same price as some 2080 Tis were, yet it absolutely mullers em, and has a lot more vram

The 2080Ti was $999 officially on launch, but was usually more like $1199. The 3090 is $1499, definitely not the same price.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

Coming thick and fast these

 

[Greebo]

Would 40% sway you? Just curious.

hmmmmm that would be getting tempting. 40% is a lot. Yeah who I am kidding, I would fold and would have ordered at 2pm on day of release

 

[Greebo]

I do fully expect RDNA2 to feature more vram. But then again if the over all power of the cards are not able to match the 3080 let alone the 3090 then what is the point?

In fact RDNA2 is rumoured I read to feature a 16GB card.

Rumours are that if its 80cu that its going to 50% faster than a 2080ti which will put it matching a 3080. Will all depend on price. There are rumours now the AMD price will be $649.

If its £649 for 16Gb card matching 3080 performance then they will sell.

 

[Greebo]

Its funny people crying saying, the 90s too expensive, when its the same price as some 2080 Tis were, yet it absolutely mullers em, and has a lot more vram

What on earth are you talking about? The 3090 is 50% higher list price to the 2080ti.

 

[tyler_jrb]

Saw this on TTL’s Facebook

 

[TNA]

Saw this on TTL’s Facebook

Risky putting that on here. Brave man

 

[Poneros]

Saw this on TTL’s Facebook

Classic

 

[tyler_jrb]

Classic

Haha

Risky putting that on here. Brave man

I mean they can try .

 

[aoaaron]

o lord sounds like a dream

it will be once i buy a GPU which can use it

 

[aoaaron]

Which games do you guys want benchmarked for the 3xxx series?

 

[Kelt]

Which games do you guys want benchmarked for the 3xxx series?

 

[Serial45]

Honestly guys can't help but feel the lacking monitor tech is a bit of a drawback for a lot looking at the 3090.
I mean I wish we even had one 32" monitor capable of 144mhz 4k at a reasonable priced.

Faced with the option of a 27" way overpriced 144hz 4k from the likes of asus or predator.
Or an obscenely oversized 43" from asus.

I just don't know why asus haven't released a 32 yet!

 

[FeFiDoh]

Plus the complete lack of (good) HDR bums me out a little. You've got 1440p/4k at good refresh rates now just add some good HDR please! It's the only thing I'd want from a new monitor going forwards.