Should assisted suicide be legal (for everyone)?

Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
No, I don’t think It should be available for everyone.

I agree with the principle that liberty is supreme, but if you’ve ever raised an eyebrow at some of the decisions being made in relation to sex, sexuality and gender at a young age then there should be obvious reasons why opening this door could lead young people down an unnecessary path to death.

It seems sensible to me to have a fairly high age requirement (or require a terminal illness) as there are so many options for most people other than death.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Aug 2015
Posts
7,067
I was thinking more in terms of ensuring people aren't being pressurised into making a decision to end their own life (think elderly family members and inheritance, or abusive relationships).

I think the doctors’ sign off should help with that since they could speak to the person without family there and observe how they are generally.
 
Associate
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Posts
2,267
Location
Bath
Can someone explain the difference between assisted suicide and euthanasia. Is the former where a doctor would give you some pills that you have to take to end your life, versus the latter where they would probably inject you with a fatal drug to end your life.

It's semantics really, but it interested me after an episode of greys anatomy showed the doctor helping a patient with assisted suicide. Which I thought was illegal in the US (Euthanasia), but it turns out that euthanasia is illegal, but assisted suicide is legal in some states.


Euthanasia- a doctor would end a patient's life. Perhaps someone in a long-term coma, or vegetative state, after lengthy consultation with close family.

Assisted suicide- the patient is given the means to end their own life, they will choose if and when to do it.

That's my take on it anyway. So I guess you're pretty much spot-on there.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,767
Location
Lincs
I just don’t think this argument is realistic with safeguards in place.

Exactly, it can't be beyond our capabilities to put robust safeguards in place.

That doesn't mean there wouldn't be any attempted or successful abuse of the system, but like with any system, we accept small risks for the greater benefit
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Apr 2003
Posts
3,330
Location
South North West
Yes.

Every aspect of human existence has risks and is exploitable. But that's no reason to deny people the official right to call it quits, or -- my area of extreme concern -- to put in plans to opt for a big dose of morphine rather than a long, slow, ever diminished, ever more expensive festering in a dementia care home.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2010
Posts
13,250
Location
London
I tend to agree with the "of sound mind" clause and being signed off by health and legal professionals to ensure no foul play or duress.

That bill mentioned above is only for terminally ill patients though.

In its defence I suspect the numbers would be somewhat shocking if you gave a quick and painless way out to whoever wanted it. Until mental health services and other issues in society are sorted, a large number of people with mental or other struggles will keep throwing themselves in front of trains and hanging themselves in the woods.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2005
Posts
12,452
No. Definitely a slippery slope...

"I quite like Grandad's house. When can we book him in for 'voluntary' suicide?"

It would be Grandad's choice, not his family, so no, there wouldn't be a slippery slope

Maybe you would like to complain about life support and people deciding it's okay to switch it off ? :)
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Aug 2015
Posts
7,067
That bill mentioned above is only for terminally ill patients though.

Yes, it’s a shame. I wonder if it will consider degenerative conditions (MS, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, Dementia) as terminal. I think these conditions should be included.

The Bill has only been ‘introduced’ too. On the second reading there is an actual debate and this is where it was thrown out last time (2013/14 I think).
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2010
Posts
13,250
Location
London
I dunno...can't see the people who are considering jumping in front of a train etc to go and get some assesment to see if they can be put down!
Well there was that story some time back of that Dutch girl who would have quite happily been euthanised if they'd agreed to it: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48541233 - OK she didn't jump in front of a train but quite easily could have.

Pretty sad but there are definitely edge cases out there.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
12 Jul 2005
Posts
20,533
Location
Aberlour, NE Scotland
For medical reasons yes. I have seen several people (mainly family members) suffer horribly from cancer before they finally passed away. My wifes father was diagnosed with terminal cancer and at first my sister in law and her husband were looking after him. When it got too bad for them and they couldn't do it any longer he was put in a specialist hospital for end of life care. The first week he was laughing and joking but within a few days he had gone downhill rapidly and was in a terrible state. Just 12 days after he went in there he was thin as a rake, in terrible pain and barely able to recognise that anyone was there. A couple of days later we went back to see him on his 72nd birthday and he was completely out of it and the smell from him constantly messing himself and being sick was horrible. My wife and I left in tears after seeing this lovely, once proud man reduced to nothing more than a vegetable. Mercifully he passed the very next day. When we lowered his coffin into the grave (the family does it up here) it weighed next to nothing. Should I ever get cancer or anything like that I am not going to die like that. I want to die on my own terms not forced to carry on in agony and messing myself just because some pathetic people think that life is so precious it should be prolonged at any cost. That is not life, it's torture. We can be prosecuted for leaving our animals suffering yet when it comes to human beings we are supposed to leave people to suffer and even prolong that suffering. So much for doing the humane thing!!
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Nov 2003
Posts
36,743
Location
Southampton, UK
I would like this right as it, counter-intuitively, would likely extend my life. If I had found out that I had degenerative Alzheimer's or another condition that would completely compromise who I am and my quality of life, I'd have to end it myself whilst I still had the ability. This would likely be well before the time that would be the case if I could ask for help, leaving me longer with my friends and family.
 
Back
Top Bottom