I was thinking more in terms of ensuring people aren't being pressurised into making a decision to end their own life (think elderly family members and inheritance, or abusive relationships).
Can someone explain the difference between assisted suicide and euthanasia. Is the former where a doctor would give you some pills that you have to take to end your life, versus the latter where they would probably inject you with a fatal drug to end your life.
It's semantics really, but it interested me after an episode of greys anatomy showed the doctor helping a patient with assisted suicide. Which I thought was illegal in the US (Euthanasia), but it turns out that euthanasia is illegal, but assisted suicide is legal in some states.
No. Definitely a slippery slope...
"I quite like Grandad's house. When can we book him in for 'voluntary' suicide?"
No. Definitely a slippery slope...
"I quite like Grandad's house. When can we book him in for 'voluntary' suicide?"
No. Definitely a slippery slope...
"I quite like Grandad's house. When can we book him in for 'voluntary' suicide?"
I just don’t think this argument is realistic with safeguards in place.
No. Definitely a slippery slope...
"I quite like Grandad's house. When can we book him in for 'voluntary' suicide?"
No. Definitely a slippery slope...
"I quite like Grandad's house. When can we book him in for 'voluntary' suicide?"
That bill mentioned above is only for terminally ill patients though.
Well there was that story some time back of that Dutch girl who would have quite happily been euthanised if they'd agreed to it: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48541233 - OK she didn't jump in front of a train but quite easily could have.I dunno...can't see the people who are considering jumping in front of a train etc to go and get some assesment to see if they can be put down!