Associate
- Joined
- 9 Dec 2015
- Posts
- 800
Any word on higher infinity fabric speeds?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 3 (5000 Series), rumored 17% IPC gain.
- Thread starter AStaley
- Start date
- Status
Yeah but then combine it with the missing SKUs.
No 5600 non-X. No 5700X.
So not only do all the SKUs get a £50 increase, but the cheap/value for money SKUs are MIA. That's what we call a "double-whammy" mate.
Associate
Isn't the price only a $50 increase across the board when comparing to 3xxx series. Not bad for what AMD are calling the fastest Desktop CPU.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Dec 2015
- Posts
- 800
Yea basically, still be best price/performance but now outright best for gaming, can't expect that and be the same price as last time. It just looks bad (is bad) because there's no 3600/3700x yet. Few bought the 3800x over 3700x, they will this time.
Associate
AMD understands that the $200 price bracket is the sweet spot. I don't think people will have to wait long for these CPU's to drop inbetween what has been announced.
Associate
I think its the cost they incured moving it to 1 CCX with 8 cores instead of 2 CCX with 4 cores. Doing that cuts a lot of the memory latency issues AMD had with their Zen 2 design
yeah it’s a $50 increase which isn’t bad. It looks worse as there is no 5700 or 3600 YET. There is clearly a big gap they can fill with those 2.
I must be honest, AMD held back today. It's clear that Zen 3 was designed to be just fast enough to claim the fastest gaming crown but held back everything else for Zen 4
I think where it hurts a little is that it's a flat 50...
For those buying eg a 5900X it's a 10% price step up over the 3900X launch price, for those looking at the 5600X it's a whopping 20%.
Given the lower end of the market is also the more price sensitive, it's a curious decision imo to apply a flat rate price bump.
Associate
5950x please lol
The 5900x looks good value to 5800x
I'll be honest, £450 is more than I wanted to spend. Between that and possibly a RTX 3070 that's over £1000 and I still need every other part for a fresh PC build. So my question is: How big of a an upgrade is the Ryzen 5 5600X (6 core) going to be over the 3600/3600x?
Yeah the 5800x still sucks as a SKU, now tho instead of looking bad next to a 5700X it looks bad next to a 5900X, lol.
It's a no-brainer to spend the extra £100 and get 4 more cores and a slightly better clock speed.
Possibly due to TSMC price increases - I think people expecting AMD to be disruptive on the GPU prices as well are going to be disappointed.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 12,758
Now that I've had chance to think about this, am I right in saying -
For each CPU it's a 26% performance increase in gaming at 1080p
So 3600x Vs 5600x at 1080p is 26% faster?
Also to whoever mentioned the 5600x is £300 it's not, it's $300 so £230
I'm a bit disappointed that the 5700X is MIA because I was looking to upgrade from 6 to 8 cores this time round
For each CPU it's a 26% performance increase in gaming at 1080p
So 3600x Vs 5600x at 1080p is 26% faster?
Also to whoever mentioned the 5600x is £300 it's not, it's $300 so £230
I'm a bit disappointed that the 5700X is MIA because I was looking to upgrade from 6 to 8 cores this time round
Boy are you in for a shock (if you don't pay VAT don't bother gloating about it, most of us do have to pay it).
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 12,758
Help a brother out?
When you convert from $ to £ you have to add VAT and that brings you very close to $:£ parity.
The UK price will be £300 for the 5600X. If there is any shortage of stock it could be more than that.
- Status