Soldato
Wrong, nVidia invented Gsync and Freesync was the 'copy'.
The Adaptive-Sync technology which I think he is basing this on was there before nvidia coined their own implementation to handle the issue, as nobody was really addressing it.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Wrong, nVidia invented Gsync and Freesync was the 'copy'.
Humbug is and he was the hype train driver for god sakes!
I have asked him which GPU is he buying like 2-3 times and he ignores me. Lol.
Relax, bug is waiting for the 7870 version of Big Navi.Humbug is and he was the hype train driver for god sakes!
I have asked him which GPU is he buying like 2-3 times and he ignores me. Lol.
I can definitely see issues with Nvidia wanting in on a special communication mode with hardware they don't make
The Adaptive-Sync technology which I think he is basing this on was there before nvidia coined their own implementation to handle the issue, as nobody was really addressing it.
Wrong, nVidia invented Gsync and Freesync was the 'copy'.
This is AMD’s solution, and it’s not proprietary. Instead, it’s based on a royalty-free industry standard known as DisplayPort Adaptive-Sync. Displays that support FreeSync don’t need a proprietary hardware module, and this makes them a bit cheaper.
Lol. How do you know?Relax, bug is waiting for the 7870 version of Big Navi.
Wrong, nVidia invented Gsync and Freesync was the 'copy'.
This may have already been answered but with the Smart Access Memory feature - will this work on all 500 (X570 and B550) series motherboards? Or just x570?
Nvidia didn't actually invent Variable Refresh Rate though. It's true they got to market in 2013 with Gsync before AMD did with Freesync in 2014 however Variable Refresh Rate as a technology or method on its own was used long before Nvidia even mentioned Gsync for the first time. Look up vector displays and/or raster displays if you are curious.
Pretty sure its any 500 series chipsets so at least B550 / X570 (and maybe A520 no idea on the latter) but you need a 5000 series CPU
Its been in laptops for a while as well but used for power saving vs games
Pretty sure its any 500 series chipsets so at least B550 / X570 (and maybe A520 no idea on the latter) but you need a 5000 series CPU
I hereby declare you the winner of this engagement.Wrong, Freesync came from Adaptive-Sync VESA open standard.
NVIDIA took that standard, added to it, made it proprietary by adding GSYNC mode for $$$$
https://www.howtogeek.com/228735/g-sync-and-freesync-explained-variable-refresh-rates-for-gaming/#:~:text=of V-Sync.-,NVIDIA's G-Sync and AMD's FreeSync,display that supports G-Sync.
I rest my case M-Lud
Yes I'm hearing rumours they are going to make 1 more push at 3D vision.several times Nvidia has taken tech that technically existed but which no one else was using and brought it into the fold for what would benefit the entire industry.
If Nvidia did not do Gsync would we have Freesync or how long extra would we have waited - maybe we'd only get adaptive sync now with hdmi 2.1
If Nvidia did not do hardware accelerated ray tracing would we have any ray tracing games now, would consoles do ray tracing now? Probably not
Nvidia was also first to implement programmable shaders
Nvidia simple would not reciprocate. Handing anything to Nvidia that will benefit Nvidia is just storing up trouble for the future. Locking them out of everything humanly, legally andI am waiting for more tech details... but it makes sense for AMD to license the tech to nvidia.
The thing about nvidia is that they dont iterate, each new gen is different and you never know what nvidia may concoct for the next gen
If i were AMD, i would oblige because.. you dont want to be negotiating from a weaker position in the future
Yeah that'll teach me to presume 'first to market equals inventor!'
As soon as I said it I thought I better go off and research it but didn't
Yup this is certainly the case I like the fact that AMD adopt open standards that are more consumer-friendly even if they don't (yet, but I think that they will catch up soon) have the same level of software expertise that Nvidia do.Wrong, Freesync came from Adaptive-Sync VESA open standard.
NVIDIA took that standard, added to it, made it proprietary by adding GSYNC mode for $$$$
https://www.howtogeek.com/228735/g-sync-and-freesync-explained-variable-refresh-rates-for-gaming/#:~:text=of V-Sync.-,NVIDIA's G-Sync and AMD's FreeSync,display that supports G-Sync.
I rest my case M-Lud
If Nvidia did not do Gsync would we have Freesync or how long extra would we have waited - maybe we'd only get adaptive sync now with hdmi 2.1
Nvidia simple would not reciprocate. Handing anything to Nvidia that will benefit Nvidia is just storing up trouble for the future. Locking them out of everything humanly, legally and
economically possible is the only way to deal with a corporation with the ethics of Nvidia (i.e.no ethics).