• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Sub £400 graphics card for 1440p gaming

Soldato
Joined
27 Sep 2005
Posts
4,624
Location
London innit
I'd honestly just hold off atm, turn graphics down a notch or run at 1080p for now. This price bracket is going to get massively shaken up in a matter of weeks and you'll have the option of something 30% faster for the same £; or some hefty discounted on existing cards as the retailers try to dump stock.
 

HeX

HeX

Soldato
Joined
20 Jun 2004
Posts
12,015
Location
Huddersfield, UK
^^ This, rumor has it the 3060Ti is due mid November for under $400, and they'll be an AMD equivalent 6700 series of some kind not far behind I'd imagine...
 
Associate
Joined
29 Aug 2013
Posts
1,176
No it doesn't. A Vega 56 is starting to struggle for 1440 now, espically at higher frames.

And a 56 is about 40% faster than a 390. I went from a 390 to a vega.
Agree. Want to upgrade my Vega 56 as it's not enough for 1440. It's good enough for most games just on the limit for recent games.

Most likely get a 6800xt or 6700xt
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Sep 2005
Posts
4,624
Location
London innit
3060ti/super or a 6700(xt?) will likely be the best choice in this price bracket. 5700xt will do watchdogs legion / red dead redemption / horizon zero dawn at 60fps @ 1440p with a bit of option tweaking but at ~£400 it's not good value right now.

A year ago, it was the absolute value king and a good buy. Now; i'd wait.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Oct 2004
Posts
26,505
Location
....
3060ti/super or a 6700(xt?) will likely be the best choice in this price bracket. 5700xt will do watchdogs legion / red dead redemption / horizon zero dawn at 60fps @ 1440p with a bit of option tweaking but at ~£400 it's not good value right now.

A year ago, it was the absolute value king and a good buy. Now; i'd wait.

Yep 5700xts will go down in the 2nd hand market very soon. I'd wait for a cheap 5700xt or whatever new mid range cards come out.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Posts
3,741
Honesty if you're looking for a £400 card right now the answer is spend another ~£50 and just get a 3070. In a few months we should have some decent mid range options like 3060/etc for more sensible money though.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Sep 2005
Posts
4,624
Location
London innit
Honesty if you're looking for a £400 card right now the answer is spend another ~£50 and just get a 3070. In a few months we should have some decent mid range options like 3060/etc for more sensible money though.

Correct, on paper it's a good card.

But we're in the middle of an arms race, 6800 absolutely kerb stomped it for not much more.

My recommendation is to turn down graphics settings and/or resolution and wait for all of this to settle down.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
18 Feb 2015
Posts
6,484
No it doesn't. A Vega 56 is starting to struggle for 1440 now, espically at higher frames.

And a 56 is about 40% faster than a 390. I went from a 390 to a vega.
Depends on game & settings. Using an RX 480 now, so close to a 390, and it does quite well at 1440p. Heck, playing WD:L now and it does >45 fps no sweat, and if the game weren't so CPU limited it could do better. Sure, if you want >60 fps that's not gonna happen, or ultra everything, or the odd game like RDR2, but in general you can definitely make it work to near 60 fps at 1440p.
When I had a Vega 64 I'd push 1800p @ 60 fps more often than not. These cards are beasts! But people gotta stop just maxing out every setting.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Sep 2005
Posts
4,624
Location
London innit
Depends on game & settings. Using an RX 480 now, so close to a 390, and it does quite well at 1440p. Heck, playing WD:L now and it does >45 fps no sweat, and if the game weren't so CPU limited it could do better. Sure, if you want >60 fps that's not gonna happen, or ultra everything, or the odd game like RDR2, but in general you can definitely make it work to near 60 fps at 1440p.
When I had a Vega 64 I'd push 1800p @ 60 fps more often than not. These cards are beasts! But people gotta stop just maxing out every setting.

You cant buy a Vega, they don't make them anymore
 
Associate
OP
Joined
15 Mar 2006
Posts
237
Would love to be able to buy one of the new AMD or Nvidia cards but think they will be out of stock for a long time sadly. I might leave it a month and see what happens.
 
Associate
Joined
12 Sep 2011
Posts
193
Hi all,

I've recently upgraded my monitor from a 24" 1080p to 27" 1440p and think I need to upgrade my graphics card. I'm currently running a gtx 1060 6 GB and I'm very aware of the new 3 series and big Navi but they're out of my price range and I'm looking to get something pretty soon. I'm not bothered about having everything on Ultra, ideally just to be able to run things on high at 60fps.

Any recommendations please?
I’d suggest saving a few quid more and getting at least a 3070, we are talking £50 more, remember patience is a virtue, virtue is a grace, put them both together makes a happy smiling 1440 face
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Oct 2002
Posts
5,010
Location
Port Toilet
No it doesn't. A Vega 56 is starting to struggle for 1440 now, espically at higher frames.

And a 56 is about 40% faster than a 390. I went from a 390 to a vega.

Im not in the habit of making spurious statements. I bought it to play Fallout 4 at the time and it plays the games I play (hitman, fortnite, command and conquer, xcom2) beautifully. Are you going to tell me I am wrong about that too?
 
Back
Top Bottom