Can an employer ask to see test results?

Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2012
Posts
439
So, my.employer has requested a copy of the negative covid test results from a colleague. He has refused to provide them due to it being a private medical record. He is now facing a potential disciplinary if he continues to refuse.

Is this legal?
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,761
Location
Lincs
Maybe the answer isn't so straightforward?

http://www.wardhadaway.com/covid-19...m-to-disclose-evidence-of-their-test-results/

If an employee has had a coronavirus test, can we require them to disclose evidence of their test results?

Obtaining an employee’s Covid-19 test result will amounts to processing personal data for the purposes of the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) and information about an employee’s health is a special category of data (sensitive personal data under the Data Processing Act 2018 (DPA)).

In accordance with the GDPR and DPA, there must be lawful grounds for processing such information. Most employers rely on employees’ consent to obtain medical information and process sensitive personal data and if the employee is unwilling to give consent, you will not normally be entitled to the information.

Special category data can be processed lawfully if it is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the data controller.
Employers may be able to require an employee to disclose their Covid-19 test if there is a substantial public interest, such as ensuring that the employee self-isolate if they have a positive test. However, there is a risk that this measure could be considered disproportionate particularly if it is enforced on all employees as a blanket measure.

and another one

Data protection

Testing involves taking and storing employees’ health data, which is highly sensitive ‘special category’ personal data that requires the highest level of protection under the General Data Protection Regulation. Businesses who want to collect and use this data must satisfy one of the prescribed conditions for the lawful processing of the data (for example, the individual’s explicit consent or that processing is necessary for reasons of public interest in the area of public health) in addition to ensuring that their processing of the data has a lawful purpose and is fair and transparent.

Employers must also take care when storing this highly sensitive personal data and ensure that all testing is necessary and proportionate. This can be achieved by conducting a data protection impact assessment, which can also demonstrate how any risks can be mitigated.

The following should be avoided when carrying out testing on employees:

  • Collecting more data than necessary for the purpose of keeping the workplace safe: employers should be dating tests to ensure accuracy and should only ask for employees’ details that relate directly to COVID-19;
  • Keeping public lists of employees who have been tested: lists should be confidential, anonymous where possible, and should not be used for any other purpose than keeping a record of testing; and
  • Naming employees who have tested positive: while employers have a duty to maintain the health and safety of their employees, this must be balanced against the individual’s right to privacy and individually identifying those who test positive is usually avoidable.
Above all, employers should be transparent with their workforce. At the earliest possible stage, they should clearly explain to their employees what data will be required, what it will be used for, who it will be shared with and for how long it will be retained. With the appropriate due diligence beforehand and open lines of communication with employees, testing regimes can be effectively introduced.

I would say the reasons of public health would be enough for the business to have the right to the test result?
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
1 Mar 2010
Posts
14,366
Location
5 degrees starboard
Under more normal circumstance a medical test will be private. In the case of an infectious pandemic disease I would expect the employer to be informed if only to protect the other employees on his site.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Aug 2015
Posts
7,034
Yes, why would your employer let someone into the workplace who could potentially be a danger to others? That could result in some interesting legal situations if word got around about what had happened.
 
Last edited:
Underboss
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Posts
11,350
Location
Guildford
All it says is

"Hi Josh, you tested negative from COVID-19 after your test on xx/xx/xxxx"

Hardly telling them his in-depth piles diagnosis or anything confidential is it.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
50,384
Location
Plymouth
Could it be he faked symptoms to get a few days off, took a "test" and it's negative but the employer doesn't believe him.

Actually, if they started self isolation due to potential covid symptoms, then the employer has a responsibility to the other employees to ensure, as part of covid security, their safety.

An employer cannot allow someone with potential symptoms back to work without the self isolation period expiring or proof of a negative test.

So it isn't a matter of whether they believe him or not, it's a matter of proof of safety. The employee can decline to provide it, they are within their rights to do that, but that doesn't mean they can do so without risk of consequences.
 
Back
Top Bottom