You can definitely have both.No seriously, is there a technical reason?
One provides light intensity, the other light accuracy, both are very pleasing to the eye. I want both.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You can definitely have both.No seriously, is there a technical reason?
One provides light intensity, the other light accuracy, both are very pleasing to the eye. I want both.
Bit of a **** time for either. Monitor choices and prices are awful currently and the overhead required to run RT is too much.
For HDR you can get one of the new LG 4K HDR TV's with HDMI2.1, They work amazingly well.
Sure, do they do one under 40” for the vast majority of people? Or is it still 48”+ for the niche?
So what your saying is, one should get an OLED TV and pair it with an Nvidia GPU? Roger thatYou can definitely have both.
I am hoping LG release a 40" one next year.Sure, do they do one under 40” for the vast majority of people? Or is it still 48”+ for the niche?
Sure, do they do one under 40” for the vast majority of people? Or is it still 48”+ for the niche?
I dare anyone to play in a dark room, with a proper HDR display, something like The Division 2 w/ neutral lighting in night scenes (esp if it's flares going off), Doom Eternal, Tetris Effect, Metro Exodus, Far Cry 5, or Jedi Fallen Order when you light up your lightsabre for light in the caves, and say they'd take ray tracing over HDR. It's just insane!
Check out the Ray Tracing difference on the first one in this video
Problem is no games currently are really using the features that make ray tracing stand out - when you have bounced light off surfaces indirectly illuminating nearby surfaces, scattered light from chromes, proper caustics (or at least a close enough approximation), etc. in real time it really enhances things in a manner that is prohibitive if not impossible to fake up decently with older techniques.
We're 2-3 generations away from that though. My vote still goes to HDR, cause games don't look like that yet and won't for a few years until we have a GPU with several times more Ray Tracing grunt than the rtx3090.
Right now, most ray tracing games might have a few reflections here and there where as HDR makes the entire image POP
A clear win for HDR. That said, If this poll is re-run a couple of years from now, maybe the results might be different.
Yup, and equal performance too.Hopefully in a couple of years we have both in proper implementation :s