Associate
Bit spoilery...
***The High-Res Screenshot Thread!***
- Thread starter ThundyCat
- Start date
Soldato
Some Valhalla @ 5120x1440
Some Valhalla @ 5120x1440
You got some good ones. Game looks great! Gonna be picking it up soon once my 3080 decides to show over the next few days.
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 7,378
Mafia 2.
Not as good as the Remake, I encountered a fair few bugs too.
Not as good as the Remake, I encountered a fair few bugs too.
Soldato
Some more valhalla
Associate
- Joined
- 20 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 1,237
Waiting for all the good cyberpunk shots to come in 
Associate
Waiting for all the good cyberpunk shots to come in
And me
Not very far in but heres a few shots ive snapped, game is beautiful looking
System Specs are 5900X, Gigabyte Aorus 3080 Master, 32GB 3600 C16 Ram, running the game on Ultra @ 3440x1440p, DLSS set to Quality, these were taken with Raytracing on the setting below Psycho, i just bumped it up now and will take some more.
Psycho Ray Tracing setting
System Specs are 5900X, Gigabyte Aorus 3080 Master, 32GB 3600 C16 Ram, running the game on Ultra @ 3440x1440p, DLSS set to Quality, these were taken with Raytracing on the setting below Psycho, i just bumped it up now and will take some more.
Psycho Ray Tracing setting
Last edited:
Soldato
Cyberpunk 2077, no spoilers, all of the above screenshots take place in the prologue which has been extensively covered by CDPR over the years. One thing I will highlight, I have NEVER seen facial expressions as natural as they are in this game. It truly is a next gen title.
Running everything max (RTX and reflections at psycho), DLSS balanced. 75-80fps average, it's a machine killer for sure! A new Crysis if you will.
Running everything max (RTX and reflections at psycho), DLSS balanced. 75-80fps average, it's a machine killer for sure! A new Crysis if you will.
Soldato
You should probably remove or censor the nude shot.
Not very far in but heres a few shots ive snapped, game is beautiful looking
There a hell lot more detail in agnes screen shotCyberpunk 2077, no spoilers, all of the above screenshots take place in the prologue which has been extensively covered by CDPR over the years. One thing I will highlight, I have NEVER seen facial expressions as natural as they are in this game. It truly is a next gen title.
Running everything max (RTX and reflections at psycho), DLSS balanced. 75-80fps average, it's a machine killer for sure! A new Crysis if you will.
Be really interested in know what different setting you two are using to make this much detail difference
Look at the buttons on them things in front of her and that Lizzies bar light, Agnes whole picture is so much sharper and clearer for some reason
Copying this over from the Cyberpunk 2077 thread, where it's going to inevitably get lost in no time. Removing quotes for ease of comparison between images.
40-50% performance uplift at 1440p ultra settings when running CAS FidelityFX static 80% on a Vega.
As for difference in image quality, that can be judged from the images below.
It's pretty amazing how well these algorithms can work these days, although the game clearly does have a certain amount of blur already present. Still a win in my book.
40-50% performance uplift at 1440p ultra settings when running CAS FidelityFX static 80% on a Vega.
As for difference in image quality, that can be judged from the images below.
It's pretty amazing how well these algorithms can work these days, although the game clearly does have a certain amount of blur already present. Still a win in my book.
If that were the case, it would be more pronounced in the close up images or the details in background items. Looks more like a DOF effect, which only shows how little difference there really is.
It clearly isn't going to look exactly like native revolution, but it certainly isn't anything like what you're making it out to be. It's also a pointless and purely contrived statement talking about Vaseline, consoles and sort of looking like things etc. given the obvious nature of the technique and large number of comparisons I've made.
I'm also not an idiot who needs to be told about things that can be clearly seen but that I must have missed.
Sorry, I should have been more clear
"As for difference in image quality, that can be judged from the images below."
It looks sharper and more detailed without CAS FidelityFX enabled.