Images of items I have purchased (except trainers)

Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
56,471
Location
Cornwall
I would have had that off in a jiffy. Go grab a hacksaw! Oh and whilst I'm moaning, look at the state of your trackpad, half a human hands worth of skin, normally you live in a lab, are you slacking? :p :p

Back in the day I used to have nukeproof carbon fibre hubs, the dogs danglies and I think what started my addiction to all things carbon fibre :p
 
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
100,345
Location
South Coast
That's not my trackpad! That's TB'ss post!

As for the hacksaw, I might do one day, but not today... some day :o

The only issue is I like the height position so cutting off the tub would mean lowering the handlebar which would then be a step backwards.
 
Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
56,471
Location
Cornwall
That's not my trackpad! That's TB'ss post!

As for the hacksaw, I might do one day, but not today... some day :o

The only issue is I like the height position so cutting off the tub would mean lowering the handlebar which would then be a step backwards.


Ahhhhhhhh, I saw the mousepad and assumed incorrect things!
 
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
100,345
Location
South Coast
I know what kind of monitor I want now when I upgrade next :D That size would pretty much go from speaker to speaker on my desk using your pic as a reference as they are on stands each side of the desk. What are the specs, QLED? IPS? VA etc?
 

fez

fez

Caporegime
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Posts
25,138
Location
Tunbridge Wells
The one thing I have never understood with Ultrawides is the low pixel density. I have 2 21.5" 4K screens and the quality is amazing. Every time I look at replacing them as they are getting old and have image retention issues I struggle to find a good ultrawide with a good resolution that isn't crazy money.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
100,345
Location
South Coast
Pixel density seems fine to me, if you get the proper size/res models you can still find a 34" for half decent money. Currently I have an LG 34UM95-P which is 3440x1440 and having seen the 2560x1080 models as well as having had 29" 2560x1080 ones too, I'd not look at anything less than 3440x1440 res at 34" minimum now really.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Dec 2017
Posts
8,454
Location
Beds
4k at 21.5" is insanely small, the pixel density is so high because that was never an optimal size/resolution ratio. Considering the point where 4k becomes "pointless" (insert debate here) is about 50" for TVs
 
Soldato
Joined
20 May 2011
Posts
5,997
Location
Aberdeen, Scotland
4k at 21.5" is insanely small, the pixel density is so high because that was never an optimal size/resolution ratio. Considering the point where 4k becomes "pointless" (insert debate here) is about 50" for TVs

No, it's what you want. You need a DPI of >200 (basically retina) to be able to run 4k with 200% scaling on Windows without looking too large. Non integer scaling sucks and is the reason why 27" 4k monitors can be so finicky. Too small for 100%, too large with 200%, UI elements look crap with anything in between. Apple understands this, and is why all their displays aim for >200DPI as their OS scaling does not bother with non integer values.

So you either get 4k at a tiny size, or 4k at a larger size so at least you can use it at 100% scaling.

And you'll easily notice the additional sharpness of very high DPI with text. Just look at any laptop with high DPI.
 
Back
Top Bottom