Trading the stockmarket (NO Referrals)

Associate
Joined
25 Apr 2015
Posts
126
Location
London
I bought a couple of shares when RH limited availability in solidarity more than for stonks. Holding out of principal now.

I imagine DFV took his winnings a day or two ago... or at least a few million. He'd be a fool to announce his movements now - both for legality and in case the apes turned on him.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Feb 2004
Posts
21,280
Location
Hondon de las Nieves, Spain
Damn volatility.

I wasn't particularly thinking last night and set a market buy order for Rolls Royce whilst logged into my T212 account.

It opened at 96 at which point my order kicked in, then immediately fell to 92. Had i just not been lazy and logged on this morning to do the trade i wouldn't be down 4% :(
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,547
Location
Llaneirwg
A lot of FOMO and greed really.
Very few actually wanted to 'screw hedge funds'.
It got into mainstream media and did a bitcoin.

People saw free money. Disgusting amounts of free money. And what appeared to be ordinary people. With a wishy washy moral story to help justify


At 300... It's still going up..I've missed out on this free money. Better put loads in. It could go to 1000. I need to catch up.

Diamond hands
Hold hold hold
Stick it to the big man


The day it was flat-ish for a whole day was a day I bet a lot got in. It was in mainstream news in full swing. But that's the tipping point often.
It was so many peoples first (and probably last) go at stocks.

And at that point people don't want to quit and lose. So hold even longer, often for days of loss, hoping to 'at least get some of my money bsck'

Have to ask yourself..how much effect did the BBC etc reporting it cost people? That's when the ordinary people get in and lose.

There's going to be a lot of hate for reddit/wsb/characters on reddit , from the public who will be looking to blame someone else for their mistake.


Have to admi . If I hadn't been in bitcoin a long time I might have joined the loss train. I have some sympathy, but people should at least know not to put in what they can't afford to lose . But that's often not the case with little retail investors. We put more in than we can really lose.


Worst sin is a lot of people will have convinced friends and family to go in. Which may leave you with no friends or family


Absolutely fascinating
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
20 Dec 2004
Posts
15,834
I've noticed a bit of swing in the rhetoric on WSB. A few posts getting upvoted about "if this doesn't go our way" etc.

I'm pretty sure most of the people that bought at <10 have taken profits now....it's all the mugs they conned into buying at 200+ that are eating the losses.
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,547
Location
Llaneirwg
I'm pretty sure most of the people that bought at <10 have taken profits now....it's all the mugs they conned into buying at 200+ that are eating the losses.

This. Anyone in a 10 ish will (should!) have taken out a chunk at 100, 200, 300. Or something like that. To make 10x is unprecedented.

But the greed of 100x is always there. Its hard to be sensible.
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,547
Location
Llaneirwg
I'm pretty sure most of the people that bought at <10 have taken profits now....it's all the mugs they conned into buying at 200+ that are eating the losses.


If one good thing comes of this, hopefully there are some hard stories that get told, that people take heed of. We all hear 'don't invest [gamble] more than you can afford. But hopefully this is a real world example
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Posts
31,991
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
Interesting that the dude who started all of this is an experienced professional trader with a ******** of spare cash.

'GameStop Promoter Keith Gill Was No “Amateur” Trader; He Held Sophisticated Trading Licenses and Worked in the Finance Industry.'

Gill was a clean cut Registered Rep at MassMutual by day and a long-haired, head-banded, fast-talking stock promoter on social media by night, sending out video promotions for GameStop that were filmed at a trading desk he had set up in his basement. (See this YouTube video by Gill. It has a caption suggesting GameStop could go from $5 to $50.)

This is highly likely to be a serious problem for both Gill and MassMutual. A genuine amateur trader could plead ignorance of industry rules about hyping stocks to the public. A heavily licensed industry professional cannot. The fact that Gill passed all those exams means that he knows what the rules are. In addition, the broker-dealer unit of MassMutual, MML Investor Services LLC, that employed Gill as a Registered Rep, could potentially face charges of failure to supervise.

Wall Street’s self-regulator, FINRA, shows on its publicly available BrokerCheck, that Keith Patrick Gill holds the following licenses: a Series 7 that allows him to trade stocks and corporate bonds for clients; a Series 3 which allows him to trade commodities for clients; and a Series 24 which allows him to function as a branch manager of a brokerage firm and supervise other licensed traders. Gill passed his exam for the commodities license eight years ago. He obtained the Series 7 and Series 24 licenses more than four years ago.

He lost $15 million on Tuesday, but he's still holding.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2007
Posts
5,581
Location
London
Damn volatility.

I wasn't particularly thinking last night and set a market buy order for Rolls Royce whilst logged into my T212 account.

It opened at 96 at which point my order kicked in, then immediately fell to 92. Had i just not been lazy and logged on this morning to do the trade i wouldn't be down 4% :(

Its not volatility, you are setting market orders.

How do you think T212 make money?
 

fez

fez

Caporegime
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Posts
25,077
Location
Tunbridge Wells
I thought Roaring Kitty was essentially talking to a few hundred people before this all blew up and has, for the most part stayed quiet throughout other than posting his positions with GME. He was just one of the first people to publicise on WSB.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
22,139
What’s the current thoughts around IAG long term? Is it likely they can bounce back from all this in 5 year timeframe?
There are going to be a lot of old aircraft sitting around that can be easily wet leased by a challenger airline (such as what Norwegian were well underway to do if it wasn't for the Trent 1000 engine problems and then the 737 MAX issues). BA is an institution though, and will always be preferred for proper 'cost is no problem' business travel.

Business travel is never going back to where it was though...with the decrease in gross revenue (client billable expenses) the big firms have responded by upping margin targets.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Feb 2004
Posts
21,280
Location
Hondon de las Nieves, Spain
Its not volatility, you are setting market orders.

How do you think T212 make money?

I assume through the spread which i accept. That's not what i'm talking about though. I'm talking about the price actually dropping in the opening 5 minutes which if i'd not been lazy and just stuck a market order in last night, i'd have ended up paying.
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,547
Location
Llaneirwg
I'm in on ezj. But I've been in since 400.
It's all or nothing with these.

Either covid won't be over this summer and the price will tank. But if (by a miracle) it literally cleared up next month these shares will rocket.

Feels a bit of a binary choice
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Oct 2003
Posts
5,518
Location
Wiltshire
I'm struggling to understand the thought process of people getting in on this at the point that everyone knows about it, i.e. where it's all over the mass media, /r/WSB growing by 6 million users, etc. I mean, if the cat is out of the bag so to speak, then surely the time of mad gains is pretty much over? It's just naked greed surely, nothing to do with GameStop or "sticking it to hedge funds" (that they probably don't understand beyond what someone on /r/WSB tells them)

I also think the notion of everyone holding, "diamond hands", etc is building on quicksand. The people coming in late in the day, looking for mad gains, spending money they barely have, are the ones most likely to be unsettled by drops. You can't expect to corral a motley crew of people with wildly different risk appetites into doing the same thing, especially when there is nothing stopping anyone - particularly the seasoned investers - from getting out or shorting GME themselves, whilst posting threads saying "I'M HOLDIN' DIAMOND HANDS YO!".. I imagine that's what is happening at this point, in the main.

Greed is going to rob quite a few people from a serious amount of money they could've made, but chose not to take because they wanted MORE. In some cases it is going to leave people in serious debt. As always the people with market nous will have already exited at ~450.
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,302
Location
Aberdeenshire
There’s no doubt this will have been planned months in advance, the share price has steadily been increasing for something like 6 months+. Get a ton of cheap shares, start a Reddit group to pump the shares, sell all your previously acquired shares for a nice fat profit .
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Dec 2004
Posts
15,834
What’s the current thoughts around IAG long term? Is it likely they can bounce back from all this in 5 year timeframe?

If nothing else....it will get significant bumps every time there's news of travel restrictions being lifted. I'm holding my IAG for a 1-2 year timeframe and I don't much care what it does in the meantime.

Provided they don't go **** up, obviously :p
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Mar 2011
Posts
5,421
I think this case does have some differences to a more traditional transparent pump and dump, and by the sounds of things if everyone had genuinely stuck properly to the premise (i.e. buy and hold until a proper short spike is triggered) it might have worked, but human nature has a tendency to ruin these things and so of course people bailed out too early
 
Back
Top Bottom