Home Ethernet Help - what to buy?

Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
Hello

I’m intending on installing a home Ethernet kit to my office - a hard wired connection from my router to my computers in the office. The wire will run through the walls and under the floorboards, no problem.

Ideally, I would like flush / neat wall connections at each end (I.e. something I plug the router into at the wall, and then something that I plug my computers into at the wall in the office).

This seems really dumb, but what do I actually need to buy for this? ‘Packs’ of bits to that effect don’t seem readily available and if I buy bits separately I think I might need to chop wires to mount them to the wall plugs etc.

Any advice whatsoever on the best way of achieving this would be helpful. Ideally, I’d want two connections in the office which I think makes it a bit more complicated....

Cheers.
 
Associate
Joined
16 May 2008
Posts
2,487
Location
Bristol
I put a couple of these in recently. If I was doing another I'd get this stuff
epw4W4w.png
Solid core vs stranded CAT5 was recommended when I looked into it and not CAT6 as is a pain to work with.
You might want shielded cable if you are running it near power cables.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Apr 2007
Posts
13,559
I wouldn't bother with shielded just not required in a domestic setting.
Don't go cheap on the cable be it cat5 or cat6, something like Excell.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Posts
12,096
I wouldn't want surface mount boxes or angular industrial faceplates at home.

I sank my backing boxes and used faceplate surrounds that matched the mains sockets. I also used deep backing boxes (47mm?) to allow plenty of room for the wiring. The faceplates I used don't stick out as far as the ones pictured above so you lose some space behind.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Mar 2005
Posts
16,820
Location
Here and There...
I wouldn't want surface mount boxes or angular industrial faceplates at home.

I sank my backing boxes and used faceplate surrounds that matched the mains sockets. I also used deep backing boxes (47mm?) to allow plenty of room for the wiring. The faceplates I used don't stick out as far as the ones pictured above so you lose some space behind.
Depends where they are for me, if they are well hidden behind furniture etc then why go to the expense/mess of flush mounting them when nobody will ever see them? If you change the room layout and/or decorate then you can bury them at that point.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Sep 2015
Posts
3,673
Depends where they are for me, if they are well hidden behind furniture etc then why go to the expense/mess of flush mounting them when nobody will ever see them? If you change the room layout and/or decorate then you can bury them at that point.

I'd still do it even behind furniture. If you shove a piece of furniture in front of a surface mounted pattress which has an ethernet cable connected you may well find that the furniture has to sit quite a long way away from the wall.

A 32mm pattress plus straight ethernet face plate and cable would mean that the back of the furniture needs to be about 80mm from the wall. That's too far for my liking.

None of my ethernet sockets are visible unless you realy go looking for them, but they're sunk back into the plasterboard.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Mar 2005
Posts
16,820
Location
Here and There...
I'd still do it even behind furniture. If you shove a piece of furniture in front of a surface mounted pattress which has an ethernet cable connected you may well find that the furniture has to sit quite a long way away from the wall.

A 32mm pattress plus straight ethernet face plate and cable would mean that the back of the furniture needs to be about 80mm from the wall. That's too far for my liking.

None of my ethernet sockets are visible unless you realy go looking for them, but they're sunk back into the plasterboard.

Plasterboard I agree I would sink, I was assuming solid walls and having re-wired our entire house sinking every socket through the victorian plaster and into the brickwork it isn't a casual job and the filth is unimaginable!
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jul 2005
Posts
19,286
Location
Norfolk, South Scotland
I'd still do it even behind furniture. If you shove a piece of furniture in front of a surface mounted pattress which has an ethernet cable connected you may well find that the furniture has to sit quite a long way away from the wall.

A 32mm pattress plus straight ethernet face plate and cable would mean that the back of the furniture needs to be about 80mm from the wall. That's too far for my liking.

None of my ethernet sockets are visible unless you realy go looking for them, but they're sunk back into the plasterboard.

That's why I use the CCL 4000 vertical/side entry surface mount boxes. They extend no more than 27mm from the wall and the way the cables go in they are much better protected than anything else I've seen.

Cat6 CCS 4000 Series - Vertical Outlets | Cat6 Modules & Outlets (cablemonkey.co.uk)
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Sep 2015
Posts
3,673
Plasterboard I agree I would sink, I was assuming solid walls and having re-wired our entire house sinking every socket through the victorian plaster and into the brickwork it isn't a casual job and the filth is unimaginable!

I'd still sink them in. It isn't that time consuming and looking at my setup it'd really annoy me if the TV unit had to sit that far out from the wall because I didn't sink the socket in.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jul 2005
Posts
19,286
Location
Norfolk, South Scotland
I'd still sink them in. It isn't that time consuming and looking at my setup it'd really annoy me if the TV unit had to sit that far out from the wall because I didn't sink the socket in.

Most people would consider cutting into the plasterwork a major job. If we opened up all the walls when we ran cables in it would be incredibly expensive to do retrofits on most people's houses. We'd have to quote to make good plasterwork and refinish the walls. If you're talking about 2-4 cables in trunking along the top of the skirting board vs. chasing out the wall and running the conduit inside the wall then the difference in cost for labour would be enormous. If you have a TV mount that is under 27mm I'd be shocked.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Sep 2015
Posts
3,673
Most people would consider cutting into the plasterwork a major job. If we opened up all the walls when we ran cables in it would be incredibly expensive to do retrofits on most people's houses. We'd have to quote to make good plasterwork and refinish the walls. If you're talking about 2-4 cables in trunking along the top of the skirting board vs. chasing out the wall and running the conduit inside the wall then the difference in cost for labour would be enormous. If you have a TV mount that is under 27mm I'd be shocked.

It's all about context. We had our living room decorated last year which included a new ceiling, flooring, skirting boards, walls reskimmed and so on. In that context a few extra chasings in the plasterboard and a bit of time with an SDS drill is fairly minor.

A few years ago I helped my brother to install some ethernet runs and we went for recessed boxes and it wasn't that much extra work. I get that it'd cost more over surfaced mounted boxes.

It's all about the end finish that someone wants. I didn't want surface mounted boxes (though I would use the ones you linked to) and as we were having the room gutted anyway it was the perfect time to get the finish we wanted.
 
Associate
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Posts
911
Was doing this very thing yesterday, we are lucky enough to have a crawl space under the floor so no chasing required all fed in to the cavity from underneath. Wouldn't do it with surface boxes looks terrible but totally depends on your circumstances.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jul 2005
Posts
19,286
Location
Norfolk, South Scotland
Was doing this very thing yesterday, we are lucky enough to have a crawl space under the floor so no chasing required all fed in to the cavity from underneath. Wouldn't do it with surface boxes looks terrible but totally depends on your circumstances.

You’re not in the UK I suspect! Most houses built in the UK in the last 50 years sit on a concrete plinth and cavity walls with plasterboard linings on the inside. If the builders prepared them properly they have ample scope to run cables in the walls. Sadly, the builders seemingly do everything they can to make it hard to retrofit anything and as a result running cables ‘properly’ usually means cutting into plasterboard and chasing out channels so most folks either go external (often in tubular conduit) or run cables on the surface of the wall (often in box conduit). Neither is perfect, but for a limited number of cables it works and it’s cheap.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Apr 2007
Posts
13,559
Our crawl space is deep enough to kneel up in no crawling required so handy for running cable's, the old access for the back boiler is perfect for then running the cables from they're their straight into the first floor and loft.
I have zero cables on show, minimum of 2x network in each room, 6x for the livingroom, 4x master bedroom.
I just do it each time I decorate a room.
 
Associate
Joined
6 Jan 2006
Posts
479
That's why I use the CCL 4000 vertical/side entry surface mount boxes. They extend no more than 27mm from the wall and the way the cables go in they are much better protected than anything else I've seen.

Cat6 CCS 4000 Series - Vertical Outlets | Cat6 Modules & Outlets (cablemonkey.co.uk)

This is what I would do (and did). Much easier than sinking them into the wall and they look great. All the cables come out underneath and look very neat, even the ones that aren't behind furniture look good.
 
Back
Top Bottom