Jury selection was delayed today as there is an appeal at the state supreme court over whether or not a third-degree murder charge can still apply - apparently the prosecution think this is relevant re: jury selection (AFAIK this gets super tactical in the US) as I guess having this charge present gives a kind of better fall back option than manslaughter should the second-degree murder charge not stick.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56325773
BBC said:
A US judge has delayed jury selection in the case of an ex-Minneapolis police officer accused of killing George Floyd, an unarmed black man, last May.
Derek Chauvin faces murder charges for kneeling on Mr Floyd's neck for over seven minutes in a widely-viewed video that sparked protests worldwide.
The delay came as the judge awaits an appeals court decision on whether a new murder charge can be added.
BBC has this slightly wrong in the above- this has already been heard by an appeal court - it's the state supreme court they're waiting on now.
"I can't breathe"
Could be a lie, he was fighting the police just prior.
Its not like he was an outstanding citizen with no reason to be believed...
Well that isn't something that the defence are allowed to bring up at the moment, their application to mention his previous crimes - threatening a pregnant woman with a gun during a house break-in won't be something the jury can hear.
On the other hand, the prosecution present them with details of Chauvin's previous complaints and has arranged some witnesses who have had previous encounters with him - I'm assuming they're not going to be too complimentary about him - though to be fair it does seem like he's the sort of cop who should have been sacked a while ago!
They need to remove knees on necks, and frankly anything to do with necks, from the American police handbook. How many deaths will make that clear?
They probably do but tbh.. it isn't actually all that clear that it caused the death here. I know it sounds counter-intuitive as we all saw him saying I can't breathe and the knee on the neck but he was saying that before he was even on the floor and he had a heart issue and a load of drugs in him - the problem the prosecution has is that the defence will put emphasis on that - note the medical examiner's comments from the article in the OP:
Washington Post said:
According to notes filed as evidence, the medical examiner told prosecutors that if Floyd had been “found dead at home alone and no other apparent causes,” it would have been “acceptable” to call his death an overdose. But, Baker added, “I am not saying this killed him.”
^^^ that is where the reasonable doubt comes in - they have a knee on the neck and the "I can't breathe", but the "I can't breathe" was shouted out before he was even on the ground and the drugs, heart problem, recent Covid infection etc.. mean they don't know for sure whether the knee on the neck killed him or whether his increased heart rate/panic etc.. combined with those other factors caused his death anyway.
IIRC even in the US it's banned in many areas but the police have got away with it because apparently if it's unsafe to do it with the knee it's unreasonable for an officer to assume that doing it with other parts of their leg is also unsafe, but then the way the US law protects police offices means that effectively they're deemed too stupid to understand what they're doing (as it's been ruled many times that unless they're trained specifically not to do something that any normal person would understand is dangerous/illegal, they're fine).
The complication here is that it seems it is permitted in this part of the US and is featured in the training materials for this particular police force, he's following his training etc.. is what the defence will likely argue.