Intel Core i7-11700K beats Ryzen 9 5950X by 8% in Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark

[turbot1984]

There are new benchmarks leaked and it looks like that the I9-11900k is performing worse than the I9-10900k

Does that mean it will cost i7 10700K cash then?

 

[Roadrunner_668]

dont you believe it ha ha

 

[Dave2150]

Not bad Dave, not bad. But you'll need better to beat the 5950X with PBO.

Sorry for necro, but had to get back to @LtMatt

Still playing with my 11900k (fun chip to OC) - currently on a NH-D15 while I build a custom loop. Settled on a conservative +1bin above the stock Intel TVB, so +100Mhz in each scenario. This keeps temperatures completely under control, even on air, though my CPU is above average quality, and has lower than usual voltage reference points for each core.

This means first two cores running at 5.4Ghz in lightly threaded applications.

Anyhow, delivered a better score than your 5950X with PBO for single thread. Obviously you smoke this in multi-thread

 

[LtMatt]

Sorry for necro, but had to get back to @LtMatt

Still playing with my 11900k (fun chip to OC) - currently on a NH-D15 while I build a custom loop. Settled on a conservative +1bin above the stock Intel TVB, so +100Mhz in each scenario. This keeps temperatures completely under control, even on air, though my CPU is above average quality, and has lower than usual voltage reference points for each core.

This means first two cores running at 5.4Ghz in lightly threaded applications.

Anyhow, delivered a better score than your 5950X with PBO for single thread. Obviously you smoke this in multi-thread

Not bad sir, I will give this a run tomorrow as I don’t think that was my best run.

Please post a Cinebench R23 ST and MT score also in the benchmark thread.

 

[gerardfraser]

I had AMD 5800X did 700+ single and 7000+multi CPU-z ,so LTMatt bust out your e-peen,if I remember correctly I had 5200Mhz on single core AMD Optimizer.
Anyway the whole Intel AMD thing is stupid and I notice a lot of people going hard for Intel. Raising prices and removing cores for the normal person, that is just crappy. I can say the Intel 10900K in Canada is $200 cheaper and is a great price for the Intel chip,I bought a 10850K for cheap and it works great.

 

[LtMatt]

Sorry for necro, but had to get back to @LtMatt

Still playing with my 11900k (fun chip to OC) - currently on a NH-D15 while I build a custom loop. Settled on a conservative +1bin above the stock Intel TVB, so +100Mhz in each scenario. This keeps temperatures completely under control, even on air, though my CPU is above average quality, and has lower than usual voltage reference points for each core.

This means first two cores running at 5.4Ghz in lightly threaded applications.

Anyhow, delivered a better score than your 5950X with PBO for single thread. Obviously you smoke this in multi-thread

Managed this, 718.9.

5950X with PBO enabled and curve optimizer set.



I am sure I can reach closer to 720 if i do a cold run.

 

[Destination]

@Dave2150 get your r23 single posted, Intel needs some representation on that thread.

 

[chrcoluk]

reviewers do need to replace cinebnch with geekbench, cinebench is convenient and free,, but still isnt representative of real world usage.

 

[Dave2150]

Managed this, 718.9.

5950X with PBO enabled and curve optimizer set.



I am sure I can reach closer to 720 if i do a cold run.

Nice I'll do some more testing over the weekend.

What memory are you running? The 3800 C14 kit in your sig?

 

[LtMatt]

Nice I'll do some more testing over the weekend.

What memory are you running? The 3800 C14 kit in your sig?

2x16GB GSkill Trident Z RGB 3600Mhz CL16, overclocked to 3800Mhz CL14.

 

[MartinPrince]

reviewers do need to replace cinebnch with geekbench, cinebench is convenient and free,, but still isnt representative of real world usage.

Geekbench and Cinebench are fairly equally representative of Single threaded use. The problem that you are highlighting is that neither Single threaded scores are really representative of many programs and games which use between 2 and 8 threads. For better 'real world'that we need a benchmark where you can select the amount of threads to be used.

 

[chrcoluk]

Geekbench and Cinebench are fairly equally representative of Single threaded use. The problem that you are highlighting is that neither Single threaded scores are really representative of many programs and games which use between 2 and 8 threads. For better 'real world'that we need a benchmark where you can select the amount of threads to be used.

geekbench has multiple tests for different types of workload it isnt just one test which is what makes it good.

cinebench is basically just an encoder.

 

[Grim5]

Geekbench and Cinebench are fairly equally representative of Single threaded use. The problem that you are highlighting is that neither Single threaded scores are really representative of many programs and games which use between 2 and 8 threads. For better 'real world'that we need a benchmark where you can select the amount of threads to be used.

Mgeekbench is trash no one should be using that

 

[humbug]

@Dave2150 Please post some scores in the Cinebench R23 thread, its just a wall of AMD we could do with some Rocket Lakeness in there

 

[Grim5]

@Dave2150 Please post some scores in the Cinebench R23 thread, its just a wall of AMD we could do with some Rocket Lakeness in there

His 5.4ghz single core probably crashes in R23

 

[humbug]

@Dave2150 put your Intel knowledge to good use, help this guy out

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/foru...cpus-or-what-is-comparable-from-amd.18925689/

 

[MartinPrince]

geekbench has multiple tests for different types of workload it isnt just one test which is what makes it good.

cinebench is basically just an encoder.

Where in Geekbench can you get a relative score for something that only uses say 8 threads? The last time I used version 3/4/5 it only gives a Single Core Score and Multi Core Score. In this regard it is not much better or worse than Cinebench.

Mgeekbench is trash no one should be using that

Exactly why is that? If you could give a more qualitative reasoning then that would be more informative. i.e. does it favour one brand over the other, are the results skewed in an unfair way etc.

 

[humbug]

Geekbench has AVX 512, something Zen 3 doesn't so it will be slower.

It the only thing Intel can win in, its why Geekbench scores were "leaked" over and over and over and over and over and over and over...... again in the build up to Rocket Lake launch, or rather pre-orders before official benchmarks.

And people wonder why others are so cynical about Intel.

 

[Grim5]

Hey Humbug

found this on Reddit, this guy's 5600x hit the lotto jackpot

2133mhz fclk!

 

[humbug]

Wow, L3 looks very low though, i've seen that around 600GB/s with AGESA 1.2.0.0.