I agree. The last 4 years has shown us the issue with other systems like have a president. In fact Russia has shown the issue with their system for a long time.
The royals not doing much is a good thing.
What about the many ceremonial HOS's that exist? It's always compared to the worst culprits as if we're too dumb to create a sensible replacement.
Also getting rid of royalty in government doesn't get rid of royalty, so the people who like the 'pomp and ceremony' can continue to bask in it if they wish.
Whatever though, i'll just wait until the inevitable scandal to come on where everyone pretends they never liked royalty in the first place and almost certainly there have been many already that the British government is forced to cover-up. Our current arrangement practically means minimal ability to investigate an entire section of government for any illicit or malicious ongoings, all the while other sections of government are burdened with making sure there is no investigation going on to the detriment of other priorities, this wouldn't be an issue if we could elect them.
If we're going to keep these people in power, then we should codify our constitution so that they be treated like any other part of the government, that they be fully accountable to the public and since that can't occur with an election... then it has to occur with expanded title deprivation and possible enforced exile if wrongdoing is discovered. If the sovereign themselves has been a naughty person, it ought to be zero tolerance with the punishment being that they willingly step down, prostrate themselves publicly and then be treated like any other person from then on.
