When are you going fully electric?

Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,058
I think BEV prices are being kept high by manufacturers at the moment. While I’ve got no evidence of that, there are signs it is happening. Manufacturers are not releasing entry level trims, the cost of batteries has almost reduced to the point that was hailed as price parity with ICE ($100/kwh) and yet price gaps remain high and manufacturers for the most part trying to meet (not exceed) their fleet emissions targets.

That said, I totally get they are a business and they will as a business want to milk their ICE assets as hard as they can while they still can to maximise profit. It’s fair to question their ethics and corporate social responsibility though given the overwhelming evidence of the damage combustion does.

It’s an interesting read on used cars and surprising that used values are not fairing well on the continent. Shame they are all LHD! Looking around the used market in the U.K., most EVs seem to hold up ok but there are a few that don’t like the etron.

You can pick up an etron 55 on a 19 or 20 plate for just over £42k, the base models RRP is £60k+

Model 3 performance seem to be creeping under £47k on a 19 or 20 plate, again a £60k+ car. Relative bargain compared to a used SR+ at around £36k (£41k new). I’ve got no idea why anyone would buy a used SR+ for that price when a new one is only £5k more. There are some on Auto Trader for £38-£40k.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
21,047
I think BEV prices are being kept high by manufacturers at the moment. While I’ve got no evidence of that, there are signs it is happening. Manufacturers are not releasing entry level trims, the cost of batteries has almost reduced to the point that was hailed as price parity with ICE ($100/kwh) and yet price gaps remain high and manufacturers for the most part trying to meet (not exceed) their fleet emissions targets..
They need to keep EV's prices higher than ICE cars to sell what's sitting around on car parks and those still coming off the production line. Who would buy an ICE Corsa, Mokka, Golf, Mini etc... if the equivalent EV version was the same price!!
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Posts
12,236
Location
UK
They need to keep EV's prices higher than ICE cars to sell what's sitting around on car parks and those still coming off the production line. Who would buy an ICE Corsa, Mokka, Golf, Mini etc... if the equivalent EV version was the same price!!
Which of course has an environmental cost, which the manufacturers should be financially penalised for, to make this practice not worthwhile.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Mar 2010
Posts
21,781
Not sure the fines are large £89M vag fine , across 230K bev's they sold ... so that's only £400 they need to load onto each bev sold,
what stops the manufacturers being a cartel.
 
Associate
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Posts
1,228
Quite a funny video on Australia's anti EV stance, until I discovered this Youtube channel about 6 months ago I had no idea it was such a backwards country. It's a little sweary [NSFW]

 
Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,058
Have you not seen the 'clean coal' skit... I mean debate in the AZ parliament where they passed around a piece of coal to show how clean it was while neglecting to mention that had been lacquered to stop it being carcinogenic and well make everything it touched black?
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,058
While electric sources for EVs are often from non-renewable energy sources such as coal (which ironically is not good for the environment), hydrogen is abundant in the air and like battery electric vehicles, nothing comes out from the tailpipe other than water in FCEVs. If electricity is generated purely from renewable sources such as wind or solar, then using an EV would truly be zero-emissions throughout the chain.

This paragraph made me chuckle. ‘Hydrogen is abundant in the air’ but no mention that most commercially available hydrogen is from fossil fuel production and splitting water uses the same coal riddled electricity as an EV but at a much worse efficiency.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2006
Posts
23,304
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2008
Posts
5,949
Rather than cars, to start with at least, I'm seeing more likely uses being heavy haulers where an absolutely massive battery could be required. Disproves the idea that many have that hydrogen cars have to have a battery too, just not as large as an EV. An hydrogen ICE appearing already. Good to see how alternative energy/fuels progresses. Very inefficient to extract hydrogen but maybe in time that will improve or be largely from renewable energy.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
16,407
Location
Shakespeare’s County
Rather than cars, to start with at least, I'm seeing more likely uses being heavy haulers where an absolutely massive battery could be required. Disproves the idea that many have that hydrogen cars have to have a battery too, just not as large as an EV. An hydrogen ICE appearing already. Good to see how alternative energy/fuels progresses

I think you might need to break that post into chunks cos im not sure what the point you are making? Fuel cell vehicles will need batteries, for buffer loads but much better if offers PHEV functionality like the stelantis vans, the lighter powerpack mass is great for payload but then doesn't wed you totally to hydrogen and most daily tasks its a local EV rather than wasting business time going to hydrogen pumps. Burning Hydrogen? Its 2021 not 2006.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2008
Posts
5,949
I'm just interested in the new techologies tbh and where they may lead. Alternatives may have some great use cases. Burning hydrogen may seem 2006 but it could still be a zero local emission alternative
As for my own transportation, I'm happy with the battery tech.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
If you figured out your monthly costs and forget about the need for ownership, you would probably calculate that you could lease+run and EV for cheaper than you can buy and fuel an ICE.
Not sure about that with my usage.

Fuel about £40 month (or less).
Insurance £30 month.
M.O.T. let's say £20 month (fairly generous estimate).

I'm seeing EV leases for ~£200 month. And I'd still need insurance, so that's £230 month. A bit more than my £90.

Oh wait hold on, let's divide that £2k by 6 years, lol. 2000/12/6 = a bit less than £30 month. And she's still going so that figure comes down every year.

So that's £120 month vs £230. OK the difference is not as great as I expected, but that's still double the expense, realistically. Of course for that you get a new car, but I'm quite happy with an old car that costs me less :p £230 is almost an entire week's take-home pay.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Jun 2004
Posts
19,437
Location
On the Amiga500
Not sure about that with my usage.

Fuel about £40 month (or less).
Insurance £30 month.
M.O.T. let's say £20 month (fairly generous estimate).

I'm seeing EV leases for ~£200 month. And I'd still need insurance, so that's £230 month. A bit more than my £90.

Oh wait hold on, let's divide that £2k by 6 years, lol. 2000/12/6 = a bit less than £30 month. And she's still going so that figure comes down every year.

So that's £120 month vs £230. OK the difference is not as great as I expected, but that's still double the expense, realistically. Of course for that you get a new car, but I'm quite happy with an old car that costs me less :p £230 is almost an entire week's take-home pay.
Is your car VED exempt?

Always YMMV. My savings are considerable against my old car, given the mileage I do and the consumption difference.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,058
Your sums have little bearing in reality in either scenario, but either way its a surprise to no one that an old car is cheaper to run than a brand new one because it’s depreciation which is the biggest expense of car ownership is basically zero.

Is £230 really almost an entire weeks take home pay for full time hours? If that genuinely is the case, no one is suggesting you are the target market for buying/renting a brand new car.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2006
Posts
23,304
Not sure about that with my usage.

Fuel about £40 month (or less).
Insurance £30 month.
M.O.T. let's say £20 month (fairly generous estimate).

I'm seeing EV leases for ~£200 month. And I'd still need insurance, so that's £230 month. A bit more than my £90.

Oh wait hold on, let's divide that £2k by 6 years, lol. 2000/12/6 = a bit less than £30 month. And she's still going so that figure comes down every year.

So that's £120 month vs £230. OK the difference is not as great as I expected, but that's still double the expense, realistically. Of course for that you get a new car, but I'm quite happy with an old car that costs me less :p £230 is almost an entire week's take-home pay.

Same for me. I run older cars which aren't depreciating anymore (one is appraciating by about 1.5 a year atm so effectively free to own). Can't really beat it with an EV especially once you add in battery lease/cover etc. and other hidden charges.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom