Disenfranchisement and I.D. Cards

Man of Honour
Joined
14 Apr 2017
Posts
3,511
Location
London
i caught a snatch of panel conversation on a TV show yesterday, the subject of Bojo’s alleged desire to introduce I.D. cards for voters was being discussed.
Someone said that if it went through, 2 million voters could be disenfranchised, as they had no photo I.D.
Now I can’t see how one can go through life these days without access to photo I.D., but I recognise that it’s the individual’s prerogative to have one or not, but the next statement blew my mind.
A guy on the panel said that 47% of black people old enough to drive do not possess a driving licence, as opposed to 26% of white people.
I can’t put my finger on why I find that remarkable, but I do.
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
It's the same argument US Democrats push, that black people don't have and are incapable of getting ID.


Doesn't sound racist at all.
 
Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
41,746
Location
Notts
something needs to be done about the huge amounts of voter fraud in certain parts of the country, not saying this is the answer but it needs dealing with
 
Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
It is pretty astonishing to think how many people get on without photo ID. Basically, people who don’t drive and have no incentive or ability to go abroad.

What different lives we must lead.
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Posts
12,236
Location
UK
OK so there needs to be some sort of photo ID charity to fix that.
Then we can use photo ID.
Those whining about rights can choose not to vote if they can't deal with carrying ID for 5 minutes.
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Feb 2009
Posts
4,978
Location
South Wirral
I smell a pending cluster-f in building the IT system to support it. It'll either be handed over to some mate of BOJO's whose IT experience was an excel training course 15 years ago or one of the usual suspects (Crapita, EDS etc) who bids low and then farms it all out to the cheapest third world developers they can find, whilst constantly jacking up the price afterwards for every tiny change. Oh ... you wanted personal data not accessible to every nosey parker on the local parish council ... that's extra matey.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2012
Posts
17,507
Location
Gloucestershire
OK so there needs to be some sort of photo ID charity to fix that.
Then we can use photo ID.
Those whining about rights can choose not to vote if they can't deal with carrying ID for 5 minutes.
We could just let people vote. There's no evidence of any but the tiniest amount of fraud.

Seems allowing voting us more important in a democracy.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Jan 2008
Posts
11,038
Where's the evidence of widespread or significant voter fraud? It's a bit crazy to assume that's an issue when you look at the general turnout and consider all the people who don't vote at all. All this will do is turn even more people off from voting, predictably in a ratio that would benefit our current government and way more than those who are allegedly committing fraud. Elections should be free and anonymous and anything that discourages people from exercising that right can only be bad for our country, as their voices are not heard.

It's a move by our government to cling onto power and to be honest, even the debate on this is a distraction from a lot of the bigger societal issues, corruption, cronyism, incompetence and fundamental constitutional issues that we should really be talking about when it comes to politics.
 

Pho

Pho

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
9,324
Location
Derbyshire
There were 6 cases of voter fraud at the last election.

There are over 125,000 children who are homeless, and 4.3 million children are growing up in poverty.

Why does the government think that suppressing voters' democratic rights is more important than looking after our kids?

https://twitter.com/AngelaRayner/status/1392219370852659200

I know it's a Labour source, but it's a good quote. It seems like a policy designed to prevent poorer people from voting; those who don't vote Conservative (ergo, those who don't matter). If we had wide spread fraud then fair enough.

Why we still have to go to a polling booth or vote via post in 2021 is laughable as well. Digitise it, let people vote online / via apps if they wish, use the blockchain etc. I can only imagine the look of shock on kids faces who've used tech since they were born when they're told they have to go write an X on a piece of paper and put it in a box that gets counted manually requiring hours of time. It's outdated.

Yes, security, hacking, fraud etc; but it can be done properly. Tie it to your national insurance number or whatever which most people have.

(I actually think ID cards are mostly a good idea for most aspects of life, but I'd want it stored on my phone which I can use like Google/Apple pay etc instead of carrying a physical card)
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Posts
12,236
Location
UK
Not being able to provide evidence just means you can't provide evidence, it doesn't mean there isn't voter fraud. The truth is we have no idea how much voter fraud there is.

Edit: lol @ Angela Rayner "There were 6 cases of voter fraud at the last election.".
How the f could she know how many total cases of voter fraud there were. She can't.
 
Back
Top Bottom