Poverty rate among working households in UK is highest ever

Caporegime
Joined
1 Dec 2010
Posts
52,326
Location
Welling, London
I do wonder how much "poverty" can be assigned to peoples lifestyles and bad choices in such a situation as you have mentioned.
Smoking is a good example. A pack a day smoker spends nigh on £310 a month on smokes. I have no sympathy for smokers who plead poverty. £310 could buy you a months worth of good food and children’s clothes.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Apr 2014
Posts
29,475
Location
Dominating rooms with symmetry
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
A significant proportion of it is learned helplessness but you'll get nuked from orbit if you try to argue it.

This is a fantastic book that everyone should read - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_at_the_Bottom
There are a lot of people at the bottom who are effectively trapped at the bottom.

Maybe some of those people made bad choices in their past. But once you're down - really down - it can be hard/impossible to get back up.

A lot of opportunities are only available to those who start near the middle. Once you're working 40+ hours a week and still struggling just to pay the rent/buy food, your options for improving your lot in life are much reduced.

Don't forget we have a lot of in-work poverty, we're not just talking about people on the dole. Plenty of it down here.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Posts
45,695
Location
Co Durham
Its calculated as a percentage - when the population goes up so does poverty. Stupid metric should be replaced with a more sensible measure looking at regional costs/wages.

How does that work if its a percentage then? If lets say 10% of the population are living below the poverty line, it doesn't matter if the population is 60m or 600m. 10% is 10%
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
29,982
Location
Norrbotten, Sweden.
I'm not sure that's quite right - there are families reliant on food banks. The increase in the number of people relying on food banks in the past year is shocking.

Yes there is and there's still people that spend on "luxuries" like smoking and cable TV subscriptions.

If you give people the option of free stuff, the uneedy will also take it.

I'm playing devil's advocate here, I'm not a tyrant. I'm just saying.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,618
Given how rich we are in this country I can't believe we still use relative poverty as a measure, a few billionaires get richer through asset inflation and 100,000's are now in poverty without being any less well off. Likewise asset price crashes and 100,000's are lifted out of poverty without gaining a pound.

I believe their are genuinely people in poverty in the UK but this is a crap measure.


you obviously don't understand statistics so ypur opinion on the definition of relative poverty is meaningless
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
29,982
Location
Norrbotten, Sweden.
I guess I'm way out of touch with the UK after 7 years but honestly how has this happened?

A working household can't find 2 or 3 quid a day to feed themselves?
I'm glad that I'm utterly out of touch.
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,308
Location
Aberdeenshire
Your argument that it was the result of furlough was worthless.
But if Furlough impacts it even though the evidence is, people across demographics have been able to save money hand over fist then as you agreed, as a measurement of poverty, “relative poverty” is a fairly useless one.

Think about it like this, are more people living in poverty if another group have become wealthier? Of course not, as a measurement, relative poverty is useless.

Don't get me wrong, working poverty is a problem that needs addressed (along with the benefit trap mentioned above), but measuring relative poverty is completely pointless as it's not something that has a practical solution beyond massaging the figures.
 
Associate
Joined
30 Oct 2011
Posts
1,191
Location
Loughborough
How does that work if its a percentage then? If lets say 10% of the population are living below the poverty line, it doesn't matter if the population is 60m or 600m. 10% is 10%

The calculation is any Household with income less than 60 per cent of the UK average are in poverty... regardless of wether they drive a lambo. Population goes up then number of people in poverty goes up. If the same calculation was performed in Monaco there would be people in poverty.
 
Soldato
Joined
16 Jun 2005
Posts
24,030
Location
In the middle
Not sure why peopel are banging on about those on benefits when the title is about working households?
Because a lot of working people are also on benefits perhaps. I'm sure there's a crossover point where it absolutely isn't worth getting out of bed in the morning to go to work.
edit. Just looked at Universal Credit, when you work and claim they take 63p in every pound you earn off your UC. Can't blame people for not bothering.
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,308
Location
Aberdeenshire
Ironically, it also encourages the government to not give pay rises to people in public sector jobs who aren’t living in relative poverty as it would create more people who are as a consequence.

Though it does incentivise giving above inflation minimum wage increases.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jan 2018
Posts
14,744
Location
Hampshire
I guess I'm way out of touch with the UK after 7 years but honestly how has this happened?

A working household can't find 2 or 3 quid a day to feed themselves?
I'm glad that I'm utterly out of touch.

It happened 7 years ago as well. In fact relative poverty stopped declining around 2004 and has been pretty flat since then. Now some people will plead poverty while smoking 40 a day and running top SKY TV package but I am sure they are in the minority.
 
Back
Top Bottom