Associate
exs said:dislike it, very much.
colours don't flow, backgrounds not subtle, buttons too large (dont look good)
(c) copyright etc, too large ( too much emphasis ), 'navigation button' way too obviouse anyway,
well it would be very nice of you if you could do one, but I'm afraid there would be no way I'd be able to pay for it.if you want me to design one for you, i will.
Martin_Man said:okay, well i'm not very good at making templates. i done that one by following tutorials
well it would be very nice of you if you could do one, but I'm afraid there would be no way I'd be able to pay for it.
exs said:no paying mate, i'm working on it now
I'll post it here as soon as i finish it.
exs said:
I'm on 1280x1024 and the header image is taking up half my vertical screen width. Which is a joke. There's absolutely no point in making the content area so teeny - though the colours are nice and mostly I think it's quite appealingexs said:
Boz said:now convert that to a nice css layout, instead of using old fashioned tables
Beansprout said:I'm on 1280x1024 and the header image is taking up half my vertical screen width. Which is a joke. There's absolutely no point in making the content area so teeny - though the colours are nice and mostly I think it's quite appealing
exs said:Do you know if dreamweaver can make css web pages?.. i've always thought of it being orientated at old crappy tables.
If it does support it, or if Golive does, then i'll make it myself for him.
hmm, i might have a stab at it, i see the impliations of css, and i genrally do enjoy using it, so i'll have a stab at itBoz said:dreamweaver supports css, you just gotta handwrite all of it. i use it purely due to the code complete functions, saves hassle and means i dont have to remember what properties all the tags have.
blade007 said:@exs
nice design. I like it.
like the graphics v.much
No, you don't understandexs said:You don't understand.. the bottom half is meant to be extented to the desired size, if Martin wants a larger content size then i shall provide the same template but larger in height.
Beansprout said:No, you don't understand
The content doesn't even begin until halfway down my 1280x1024 screen. Which is a lot of wasted space. There's no need to scroll for a few paragraphs of text.
This isn't your site, nor should you be designing based on what you like - you should be aiming to match content and suit the site's intended audience. What works for one site, might not work for another. Nonetheless, I expect the design will go through several reworkings, and the design decisions are up to Martin_Man in the end .exs said:[...] because that is the way i like it, and it's how it is going to be.