Jump to SATA from IDE. is it really worth it?

Associate
Joined
7 Jan 2006
Posts
34
Location
Manchester
Hi all,

I currently have a WD 40gb and an IBM 80 gb IDE hard drives. Both are fairly old and noisy drives and am looking to update to quieter and faster drives. What kind of differences would I expect from my current set up below with a sata 2 drive and what would you recommend I go for?

I mainly use my system for web browsing, ms office, MP3 playing/download and gaming.

Any thoughts?

thanks again for a brilliant site

Medrep
 
Associate
Joined
17 Nov 2005
Posts
1,490
Performance wise I never saw much of a difference between upgrading from IDE to Sata drive. The only advantage I notice is the fact that the SATA cables are far easier to work with esp when trying to tidy your wires plus these no carry on in regards to setting up the jumper settings. I suppose if your planning on having 3 or more hard drives then Sata will probably be easier to work with.

You will notice a jump in performace thou if you get a Raptor.
 
Associate
Joined
25 Oct 2002
Posts
1,707
as far as i know sata just gave more bandwith to ship data off the drive with and the drives are still limited by the actual rate the drive can spin / read data at.
isnt the bandwith limits of the ide pci bus around 133mb/s which general drives sata or other dont reach? excluding raid
 
Associate
Joined
12 May 2003
Posts
281
Location
Sunny Stoke
Same here,not really noticed any earth shattering speed difference but much neater install with the thinner cable.
I am happy with my Samsung drive and tend to use nothing else when building or upgrading for people.Very quiet drive too.
 
Permabanned
Joined
10 Apr 2004
Posts
13,122
Location
Darlington, County Durham
I wouldn't hold high hopes for any improvement.

Currently the only benefit has for me over IDE, is the narrow cable - means better airflow.

Until either hard-drive manufacturers get their fingers out their backside, or we get faster permanent storage, then we're stuck with the pathetic limits of hard-drives.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Jan 2006
Posts
2,524
I went from a 80GB 7200 Maxtor ATA133 2MB to a 250GB 7200 Seagate SATA 16MB.

Loading/startup times are improved and there is less hesitation accessing the disk.

I put this down to better drive electronics and a larger cache rather than the change in interface.

If you have an older 5400 drive you'll notice an improvement to 7200 and 8mb cache

AD
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Aug 2004
Posts
10,987
iv got 4 drives, 2sata and 2IDE, windows, pagefiles, etc spread across all of them, no noticible difference.

The only difference I notice with drives is how new they are, how fast the spindle speed is and how well the manufacturer has written the drives coding, my IBM sata drive is noticibly faster than my maxtor one, yet there both specced the same
 
Back
Top Bottom