vapor matt said:
I agree it makes very little diffrence, but the 74g is faster! so the new flag ship raptor 150g isnt fastest in everything.
http://www.storagereview.com/php/be...&numDrives=1&devID_0=308&devID_1=306&devCnt=2
If the random access do not translate into real world performance in applications, then I would not put much weighting on it.
Two 1st-Gen Raptor in RAID-0 will gives you (close to) twice the sequential read/write performance to a single one. Which is more than even a single 3rd gen (150GB) Raptor can manage. But that is the only advantage you will gain.
The 2nd/3rd gen Raptor will be faster across the board in every functions that does not rely heavily on sequential read/write.. which is most applications.
Where you
may notice a loss in performance is during Windows boot up (which seem to heavily benefit from RAID - but personally I can wait a few extra seconds myself), benchmarks, and video editing (from the top of my head). For other applications, the benefit is closer to nothing to 20%.
Having said that.. the Raptor is a lot of money for what it provides right now. It is one of those things where you need to know you are paying a big premium for the last few % of performance boost. It's premium storage.. just like the FX60 is a premium CPU, £200 RAM, etc.